The Realities of Einstein’s Relativity and Our GPS System

Written by:  • Edited by: RC Davison
Updated Feb 8, 2010
• Related Guides: Gps Receiver

If it were not for direct application of Einstein’s Special and General Theories of Relativity we would literally be lost using our Global Position System! Read on to find out why.

GPS and Relativity

Almost everyone who has used a cell phone, mp3 player, watched television or surfed the Internet has heard of Albert Einstein and his theory of relativity. A somewhat smaller percentage may know that the “theory of relativity” actually exits in two parts: the Special Theory of Relativity and the General Theory of relativity. Probably a much smaller percentage of that group may know that with out the application of Einstein’s two theories, the GPS units in our cars, phones and anything else that might move would not work very well. In fact, they would be down right useless!

Artist's Conception of a GPS Satellite in Orbit
click to enlarge

The Theories and Their Effects

There are two key elements, one in each theory that come into play to make the GPS work.

In Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity he united space and time into one entity—space-time. Within this new continuum, time slows down as you move faster. Many have probably heard of the twin paradox, where a pair of twins is separated; one stays on Earth and the other travels on a trip to a nearby star at near the speed of light. When the traveling twin returns home he finds his Earth-bound twin much older than he is. The space trekking twin’s biological clock slowed down as the speed of his spaceship approached the speed of light. This characteristic of time has been proven by comparing two atomic clocks: one stationary on the earth while the other was flown around the world aboard a jet plane. The clock that went for the ride was slower than the clock that stayed behind.

Very interesting, you might say, but what does this have to do with my GPS?

Clocks and Relativity - Hawley and Holcomb, 222
click to enlarge

The GPS satellites are in orbit above Earth at an altitude of 26,600 km (15,960 miles) and to stay in that orbit they are moving at a speed of 14,000 km/hr (8,424 mph) relative to the surface of our planet. This speed, although not any where near the speed of light (299,793 km/s or 186,282 mile/s) is still faster than any reference spot on the earth is moving, therefore a clock aboard a GPS satellite will run correspondingly slower - about 7200 ns/day (7200x10-9seconds/day) - than a clock on Earth. This is a very small number indeed, but very measurable and that difference needs to be accounted for.

Now for the General Theory of Relativity. In this theory, gravity comes into play and it too affects time. To be brief: a clock in a gravitation field will run slower than a clock in a weaker gravitational field. Again, looking at the GPS satellite orbiting above us, we should immediately realize that the satellite is in a lower gravitational field than we experience on the surface of the earth. Acceleration due to gravity falls off as: 1/(radius)2. It is not zero, as some people might believe it would be in space, but at this altitude is about 4% of the acceleration we feel here on Earth, known as “1-g”, or 9.8m/sec2 (32 ft/sec2)—small, but not zero. This corresponds to an increase in the clock of about 45,900 ns/day; a much bigger affect than that provided by the satellite’s speed.

The changes in time due to these properties of relativity total to an increase of about 38,700 ns/day and will conspire to make your GPS receiver build up errors in location that could cause it to be off on the order of kilometers after several hours—up to 10 km (6 miles) per day! The system is designed to correct for these errors by setting the atomic clocks on board the satellites to run slower than their corresponding reference on Earth before launch, so that once in orbit, and the effects of relativity take hold, the satellite’s clocks speed up and very closely match the reference on Earth. There are also corrections that are made to the satellite’s clocks to adjust for abnormalities in the satellite’s orbit that will cause their speed or altitude to drift over time.

Thanks to the amazing insight of a patent clerk almost a century ago, today you can drive from New York City to Los Angles and trust that your GPS receiver will guide you unerringly to your destination.

Credits

*Hawley, John F. and Katherine A. Holcomb, Foundations of Modern Cosmology, Great Britain, OXFORD University Press, 2005, pg 222.

"What the Global Positioning System Tells Us About Relativity", Tom Van Flandern. http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/gps-relativity.asp


Comments

Showing all 8 comments
 
RC Davison May 22, 2010 11:16 AM
Milan - Relativity and GPS
Milan,
If I understand your first question, you do not need to take into account the STR for the observer on the ground because that is the reference frame that you use to calculate the effects of the satellite in orbit. The STP and GTR both involve reference frames and it is important to make sure you understand which frame of reference you are using to make your calculations.
For the second question, the gravitational force between two objects is dependent on their mass and the distance that separates them. The satellites stay in orbit because the force of gravity is balanced by the centripetal force.
I'm not sure I quite understand your last question.

Thanks for the questions!

RC Davison
Milan May 18, 2010 2:07 PM
Relativity and GPS
Please briefly explain to my questions:

1) If we have calculated the effect of GR-A Clock on the ground and in orbit,
why and for STR effect does not account the effect of rotation of the Earth at that Clock, but only one in orbit?
2) When calculating the gravity of orbiting satellites used the term GM / R ^ 2.Why not Rw ^ 2 (centrifugal acceleration)?
3) If the gravitational acceleration equivalent inertial, why not take that the GPS satellites in weightlessness?
Thanks
RC Davison Jan 3, 2010 7:08 PM
Jed - Relativity and GPS
Happy I helped out.
It can be a bit confusing but when you get the facts down on paper it's easier to see the relationships.
Thanks,
RC Davison
Jed Jan 3, 2010 5:29 AM
Relativity and GPS
Hey, Thankyou so much this really helped me understand the correlation between the two!!
RC Davison Sep 24, 2009 9:07 AM
Clock Setting Conclusion
Many thanks to "mash" for pointing out the "error" in my ways.

As of September 24, 2009 the article has been corrected to say that the GPS clocks are set to run slower on Earth to compensate for the increase once in orbit.

RC Davison
mash Sep 20, 2009 3:35 AM
Your clock setting conclusion
Okay article except that your whole conclusion is incorrect. Without correction, satellite clocks run faster than ones on earth. Satellite clocks are adjusted to run slower to compensate for this fact, not faster as you conclude. I would suggest the tutorial given by the Army reasearch Lab in Colorado Springs "PAWG" for the correct explanation.
RC Davison Sep 15, 2009 4:52 PM
Relativity and GPS
Susannah,
Glad I could shed some light on this interesting application of relativity for you! Thank you!
RC Davison
Susannah Aug 30, 2009 7:22 AM
Relativity and GPS
Thank you for your article. I have been having real trouble finding an explanation regarding the relationship between relativity and the GPS system that I could actually understand. Others were simply too technical with lots of equations and formulas. Thank you!!!
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend