Fingerprints are the unique identification of an individual but physical fingerprinting is fraught with many errors due to the subjective nature of matching. Fingerprints do lie sometimes and here is a story about an able detective officer who had to be treated for depression after being accused of leaving a fingerprint at the scene of a murder and lying about it. Police detective Shirley McKie from Scotland denied ever being in the house and later went on trial for perjury because she stated this under oath. It turned out the fingerprint was not hers, experts had made a big mistake. Nevertheless it took a heavy toll on her life due to the mental agony and depression she had to go through as a result of this incident.
DNA fingerprinting is much more reliable and is based on identifying individuals by scanning 13 DNA regions known as loci, and the chances of one pattern matching another individual are extremely rare.
This fact can be used to build the DNA profile of a person by using their hair, blood and body tissues. The DNA profile of such items found from the crime scene can be matched against a pre-built database of citizens or suspected criminals in order to try and find the perpetrator of the crime.