The first thing to say is that ear shape is not an 'either or' kind of trait. The human ear comes in a vast array of varieties, or phenotypes, and each of these will probably be governed by their own patterns of inheritance. And there maybe epigenetic factors too, which will further complicate the pattern.
Another complication is that earlobe attachment is likely to be influenced by many genes - a polygenic inheritance pattern. This idea was mooted as long ago as 1965 by Dutta and Ganguly and reinforced by Palkovich in 2006: "After nearly a century of inheritance studies, geneticists have been able to identify very few specific biological traits which are determined by a single gene. The overwhelming major of physical traits are polygenic, that is determined by the complex interactions of multiple genetic units."
The more we find out about how our genome works - i.e. the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms, 'junk' DNA having value, the role of sub-cellular, cellular, and extra-cellular environmental factors such as nutrition - the more we realise how much can sometimes be masked by over simplification. But that is not to say that the inheritance of facial characteristics is not a good starting block for understanding how genetics works.