Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1

Written by:  • Edited by: Paul Arnold
Updated Nov 9, 2009

The human body is not perfect. Some are created with inherent faults and others break down before their time. Science has the potential to make good these problems by altering how humans are made. This is genetic engineering, and this article looks at the pros and cons of the technology in humans

Definition of Genetic Engineering

This is part one of a two-part series. Here I will look at a definition of genetic engineering and the pros of human genetic engineering. In part two the cons and the ethics of human genetic engineering are discussed.

Before weighing up the pros and cons of genetic engineering in humans, it's worth taking the time to understand just what is meant by the idea. Simply put, it's a way of manipulating our genes in such a way as to make our bodies better. This alteration of a genome could take place in the sperm and egg cells. This is known as germline gene therapy and would alter the traits that a child is born with. The changes would be inheritable and passed down through the generations. It is currently illegal in many countries.

The other way to change our genome is to swap our bad genes for good ones - in cells other than the sex cells. This is known as somatic cell gene therapy. This is where a functioning gene could be fired into our bodies on a viral vector to carry out the functions that a faulty gene is unable to. This technology is permitted, though it has enjoyed a very limited success rate so far (largely because it is technically very difficult). Nonetheless, it still holds out a great deal of promise.

Pros of Genetic Engineering in Humans

There are many potential advantages to being able to alter the cells in our bodies genetically.

To make disease a thing of the past

Idiopathic cardiomyopathy - genetic mutations can make some people more susceptible to diseases such as Cardiomyopathy - image released into the public domain by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
click to enlarge
Most people on the planet die of disease or have family members that do. Very few of us will just pop up to bed one night and gently close our eyes for the last time. Our genomes are not as robust as we would like them to be and genetic mutations either directly cause a disease such as Cystic fibrosis, or they contribute to it greatly i.e. Alzheimer's. Or in the case of some conditions such as the heart disease Cardiomyopathy, genetic mutations can make our bodies more susceptible to attack from viruses or our own immune system. If the full benefits of gene therapy are ever realised we can replace the dud genes with correctly functioning copies.

To extend life spans

Having enjoyed life, most of us want to cling on to it for as long as possible. The genetic engineering of humans has the potential to greatly increase our life spans. Some estimates reckon that 100-150 years could be the norm. Of course gene therapy for a fatal condition will increase the lifespan of the patient but we're also talking about genetic modifications of healthy people to give them a longer life. Once we fully understand the genetics of ageing it may be possible to slow down or reverse some of the cellular mechanisms that lead to our decline - for example by preventing telomeres at the ends of chromosomes from shortening. Telomere shortening is known to contribute to cell senescence.

Better pharmaceuticals

The knowledge gained by working out genetic solutions for the above could help with the design of better pharmaceutical products that are able to target specifically genetic mutations in each individual.

Part 2

As deliriously exciting as some people believe genetic engineering to be - there are several downsides and ethical dilemmas which will be discussed in part two.


Comments

Showing all 99 comments
 
SuperGoomba644 Feb 3, 2012 12:02 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
That's messed up what your saying. Everybody deserves a life until "God" says it time to go,(by God I mean naturaly),or a disease can't be cured. People have hearts ya know. How would you feel if your loved family member got a life threating disease? That happend to my brother who was a quadrapalligec I diden't even get to see him but 2 times in my life. I didn't get to go to his funeral. You think i wanted him to die like that! I wanted him to live over the agr of 20! I wanted to be able for him to be a brotherly figure. Instead I had to help him eat! You think he wanted that huh? You disgust me.
nunya Feb 1, 2012 1:12 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
I highly dissagree with genetic alteration. Playing God is not cool, there is one God and only one.
Quintara2001 Jan 23, 2012 12:15 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
You do not cover the fact that a study was done on 10 genetically altered children and 9 of them had Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) deficiency. Auto-immune disease, the inability to fight disease.
TMX Dec 20, 2011 8:07 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
Is it playing God? Is it truly playing God to modify ones cells for a longer life? Now I can understand you saying this if they said "Genetic modification will make you live forever," or "...it will give you control over time and space." If God wants to take ya he will, but what is the harm in not wanting to die just yet?
Larb Dec 16, 2011 6:58 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
our population just reached 7 billion.  if ALL 7 billion of us stood shoulder to shoulder we could fit in Los Angeles. we have enough room on the earth<br>also, we have enough food on the planet.  its that the food is now becoming expensive and money is tight not everyone can afford it.<br>its not like EVERYONE will live forever. if there is not enough money to buy food then how will everyone be able to buy for children to live longer.<br>thanks.
Ella Baker Dec 2, 2011 4:35 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
The<br>U.S. population has historically placed a considerable degree of trust in the<br>regulatory oversight provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and its<br>agencies. There is little tradition of people having a close relationship with<br>their food, with the overwhelming majority of people having bought their food<br>in supermarkets for years. But the 2003 survey by the Pew Research Center showed<br>that even in the U.S., 55% see GM food as "bad" food. A 2010 survey<br>found that over one third of U.S. consumers were very or extremely concerned<br>about GM food, a 3% reduction from 2008.
Obigred0408 Dec 1, 2011 4:34 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
Genetic engineering is an amazing scientific accomplishment.  That said leave it alone like our ability to travel to the moon. Nobody is being cheated out of life by not being given the cure to their genetic predisposition, luck of the draw or by "God's" hand.  Not all technology should be used.  look at the nuclear bomb.  awesome we can harness the power of all bombs into one.  We dont use it because we know its affects on the Earth and its people.  I say oh well.  You got what you got and their is no reason for anyone to mess with it.  What if someone had genetically altered Einstien or Ghandi?  I dont believe in the phrase playing God.  No matter what you believe in, God did not come down and personally deliver you from your mothers womb.  Therefore he doesnt have any say in this.  But to play a part in the world that would be defined as "Godly" is wrong.  What happens when the testing your conducting goes wrong and you have the most beautiful and healthy child except that his mutated genes allow him to catch the flu and mutate that into something that no one elses body can fight? then what?  An old phrase is best here.  Leave a sleeping dog lie.  Mother nature has been doing fine killing off enough people to maintain that precious balance.  Dont push her over the edge.  Don't fix what aint broke.  people live and people die.  nothing broke their, its how the universe works.  Have any of you ever asked a 90 year old person if they wanna live for another 50 years.  Have you ever asked them to imagine living for another 50 years with the pain that their bodies have?  No because maybe when you get there you will realize that at some point you die and you actually start looking forward to it.  Those who are for this type of engineering seem to be scared of death in my opinion.  The reason we have all these diseases and conditions in the first place is because we weren't built for life after 50.  None of these cancers showed up until after we extended life through hyg
KAMEHAMEHA Nov 28, 2011 5:10 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
Me gustan los hombres
KAMEHAMEHA Nov 28, 2011 5:08 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
I think we need to kill all people who dont like ham.  It would make the world a better place......<br>                                                   KAME HAME HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
KAMEHAMEHA Nov 28, 2011 5:06 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
i like god
KAMEHAMEHA Nov 28, 2011 5:04 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
i like you fabi
camilla Nov 28, 2011 11:39 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
God is real, 'nuff said.
Steve B Nov 28, 2011 12:53 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
god is not real, therefore we would be playing no one
shedell Nov 22, 2011 7:41 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
wat can i really say god did made us in ah special way.So it is true dat whosoever changes da works of God pay da price...........
OptimisticStranger Nov 14, 2011 4:36 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
I find the idea that people think they can play god insulting to my faith. How is genetic engineering playing god? Who says manipulation of genes is godly? Or is on par with the Christian idea of god? Not to mention the fact that the actualization of genetic engineering as a wholly safe practice is far off, as we have yet to perfect its methods. Genetic engineering of humans is quite ethical, as enhancements would only optimize our capacities and abilities, and allow us to cure horrible diseases. As it stands the real argument over genetic engineering is whether the means justifies the ends. Is the cost of genetic research, and the consequences of that reasearch, justified by the end result? Also, who says we are overpopulated? Our current means of production and distribution of food are the only limiting factors; space on the earth's surface is no where near overburdened. Polution concerns are also being addressed, and with this new green movement we will hopefully reach a more sustainable and environmentally friendly way of life soon.
Seth Oct 3, 2011 5:09 PM
Terrible!
I'm completely against! It's a horrible idea, and as many have stated, you simply cannot play God.
Anonymous May 25, 2011 3:46 PM
Good to an extent
Yes, genetiv experimentation can be good.. only to an extent. But, the fact that it could be used to make peopl smarter, faster, or "goodlooking" isn't right or fair. As someone had said, You can't play God. Who gives you that right?
Firdous A. Wani May 1, 2011 10:04 PM
Genetic Engineering
It true that Genetic Engineering is a terrific tool in hands of the responsible scientist but the same tool is liable to be miss used by those who have no conscience or Fear of nature. It is not happening first time. Many a times world have seen that the very beneficial technologies have been turned in to bad and even dangerous tools of destruction - say atomic energy. how much fear humanity is having and how much resources humanity is spending to safeguard this technology not to be used by those who are not so humans and least care for humanity or nature.
So it is right time to think, think seriously by the civil society and other stakeholders, the future of this technology. But this technology has come and will stay with the world, so the solution must be within and inclusive, so that the minimum disadvantageous as possible this technology may be for the humans and nature.
Firdous Wani
NIT, Srinagar.
Agua Apr 29, 2011 4:42 PM
It is everything but simple
I am mostly against genetic engineering, but let me just point out that whoever said it was a simple and obvious choice that he/she is wrong. There is tremendeous controvercy about the subject. Like everything else in the world, there are pros and cons.And, like everything else in the world, it needs to be used in moderation. Genetic engineering can be good until it is taken too too far. Then again, who has the right to say when it has gone too far? That is the mayor problem, I think. We cant control how much our government might exploit it, should it be allowed.

I am not for biological tampering, but I understand why some people are. That is also important to keep in mind: If we are going to present a point to someone, we must first understand where they are coming from and why they care. And we cannot SIMPLY say that they are wrong because this subject is much more intricate than all of us care to realize (myself included).

Anyway, try not to pull each other´s hair out and have a nice day..
Anonymous Apr 28, 2011 12:38 PM
In some extent...
I think that Gentetic Engineering on humans is wrong. Not just wrong but enviromential and opposing religious ways wrong. However, Genetic Engineering on food or resources such as harvest could benefit us in many ways. We will be able to feed the hungry and not have to worry about short food supply in the future.
Camryn Bist Apr 27, 2011 2:12 PM
god
it's simple... YOU CAN'T PLAY GOD!
bon Apr 7, 2011 3:39 PM
this is bad
im debating about this in class, and i'm for genetic engineering minorly, but I didnt want to be on the opposite side of my friends.
fadumo Mar 1, 2011 2:29 PM
why
why can everyone agree that look doesn't metter the only who athers look the only thing that is metter is that you are a life and you are human !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thank you
russell hopkins Feb 17, 2011 10:48 PM
you seem to forget
you seem to forget that a lot of poeple are suffering out there because they have been dealt a remarkably short straw in life. There was a comment that everything happens for a reason refering to lifespan and death. Yes, death undoughtbly happen's for a reason but surley do you not think that the technology of GENETIC ENGINEERING has evolved for a reason too. There are spin offs to every techonology, they might not all be good but the best thing about it would be to give poeple the opertunity to live comfortably without pain, it is a tricky situation though because the prospect of social unfairness arisses.
bob Jan 10, 2011 4:41 PM
sup
genetic engeneering is the best thing that ever happend to this world
Fabi Dec 8, 2010 8:15 AM
just saying
I agree with doom boy over here. The fact that life is going to end is what makes it so worth while and so precious.

As for the movie Gattaca, I watched too and i loved it. I recommend it to all of you random comment posters.
Trevor Dec 7, 2010 6:33 PM
Doom
Because we are going to die and never come back makes life so sweet, because we are doomed we are human
Sihan Nov 18, 2010 11:17 PM
Sad Movie
In class we watched this sad movie clip from the movie "Gattaca" It was so sad i think I'm going to watch the whole movie online. It was about this boy who wasn't genetically modified and his dad loved his little brother better because he was. So sad then the teacher saidthat in the boy wanted to be a austronat, but couldn't because he wasn't engineered to do that and he stole someone else's identity to become and austronat. Then his little breother became a police and was trying to find out why something was fishy. Well you guys should watch it. I only watched like 5 min movie clip because the teacher said we get to watch the rest in high school. That's whhy I'm on this site to do a paper about genetic altering genes which is so wrong... not in the wrong wrong way just in the not nice way.
Cameron Nov 11, 2010 9:37 AM
Half and Half
I do like it in some respects but misreading animals is wrong!
Fabi Nov 11, 2010 8:34 AM
Environmentally Wrong
I'm sure we can all agree that there are many pros and cons to genetic engineering, but we have to look back at our environment first before we argue on its effect.

There are too many human beings on this Earth right now. We are at an almost unsustainable number. The reason disease, and other defects, exists is to prevent overpopulation. It's not just an ethnicity issue anymore. If we cure all diseased people, if we all manage to cheat death for 150 years, we are going to grossly sever our world.

1. No more space for so many people
2. much more degree of pollution (honestly, a lot!)
3. Misbalance on the food chain (as humans live longer, there will be more demand for chicken, cow, pig, etc. It's going to be a mass production and at some point there won't be enough animals to feed everybody)
4. if we can barely feed everyone on earth today, how do we plan to feed all these people?
5. Countless animals will loose their habitat by human expansion (misbalance of food chains)
6. deforestation (more wood for furniture and houses)
7. ethnicity: is it right to cheat death or accept it when it comes?
8. gross decline of natural resources
9. exploitation of genetic engineering (people will stop doing it because its necessary and just do it to enhance their physical appearance)

I understand completely that it would be amazing to save a loved one from death, but once we are through that mourning process we must realize that, however painful, there must be balance, just like with any other species.

Too much of a good thing is never good, and everything happens for a reason

Whether you believe in god or not, enjoy every day. and embrace death when it presents itself to you.
jennifer patel Nov 3, 2010 12:03 PM
Genetic Engineering
i think its just WRONG!!!! End of the story
princess Oct 28, 2010 11:56 PM
genetic engeneering
genetic engeneering, although i don't agree, can be good, however think of a life where you know you where just put on this planet to help some body else and not becausse some one loved you i mean think about it you where put on earth to healp those who your parents love and not because you are genuinly loved as you. i understand that helping others is a good thing however giving up the life you desire so that someone else can live it is not what angone would want to do.
yeah Oct 26, 2010 9:30 AM
Immoral
I see your point, atheists are okay with this issue. If you don't believe, you don't believe. If you think my cells got here randomly and formed to create life, go ahead. But engineering your child is wrong, that's God's part. It's his duty. The moment we start trying to play God is the moment we begin playing with fire.
idk hahahah Oct 19, 2010 8:37 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
god also said we should fallow him be faithfull yes i no life is short and precious that is why we should enbrace it not make it longer and not know our past mistakes learn from them and move on faith is what god would want from us.....not to not know who he is by running away from death........to live and to die is our fate.......
Ronny Oct 9, 2010 1:34 AM
Newsflash
Umm, to all of the people who say that God designed us this way, and that we shouldn't change that, I have news for you.
'God' has given us this knowledge, so why shouldn't we use it? If "He" didn't want us to have it, then we wouldn't.
Anyone who knows the story of Noah's Ark would know that God said that he would no longer meddle with the affairs of Humans. He would let us develop as we would. This is where we have developed to, and we continue to develop past this point. 'God is no longer a part of these arguments.
This is harsh, I know, but people cannot keep on using the 'God' argument. I accept that is their belief, but it is just that: Belief.
Anonymous Oct 8, 2010 9:11 AM
Genetic Engineering: Approved by God
◦"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." (Genesis 1:26) ...yeah...nough said.
gaby Oct 6, 2010 12:37 AM
human engineering
well for me human engineering can be both bad and good for example if you were to have to carry a genetic desaise that passes threw females or males it would be changed and how much i would apreaciate this it would be great because my grandma had to choose adoption because she did not know that the weman in the family had to carry a desaise so ifthey had a son they would have mental problems
Make up a name... Oct 1, 2010 2:53 PM
Both sides
I honestly don't think that everyone would look the same as everyone else with genetic engineering. Sure, there'd be those groupies that would want to look like the popular people, but there are enough strong-willed people out there that would want to look different. With genetic engineering, everyone would look the way they wanted, and most of the time, it would all be different. Sure, there'd be engineering "fads" and such, but that's inevitable.

The other side of this is, with genetic engineering, we'd end up overpopulating the earth. It's starting to get overpopulated anyway. We don't need more long-living people who are wasting planet resources at a tremendous rate. I say this, and I'm not even a tree hugger!
Grant Sep 28, 2010 3:33 PM
This is a chance to save our selves
first off, you people saying "GENECTICALLY MODIFIED BABIES IS WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!" and "GOD LOVES EVERYONE!!!" please wake up from your brain washed life. I know that sounds harsh but really, think about our modern society. The things we are doing to our world are going to come back to haunt us.. In a very close future. The human race worries so much about themselves. Why do we need the things we have??? Do you think what ever force or freak accident planned for us to be... say sitting in this well engineered chair typing on a computer?? Screw technology. Lets use this what we have right here.. fix the genetics we've messed up over the past thousand years and live like the movie Avatar basically. (without the flying dragons and what not.. you get the point)
Sophia Sep 25, 2010 7:35 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
i have no interest in god but i still think genetic engineering is wrong. there are too many humans on this planet as it is. the last thing the world needs is people living for 150 years. think about all the pollution we produce just by going about our daily business. genetic engineering is wrong.
Josephine Fletcher Sep 10, 2010 11:55 PM
Genetic Engineering
Genetic engineering is bad for the entire world because if we live longer then the world will become more overpopulated and [not being cruel] people wont die when they are meant to. if the world becomes overpopulated then our planet will die. i agree with Stephen Hawking's theory that we have two hundred years to reduce our population or populate outer space before we all go exstinct.
Firdous Wani Sep 6, 2010 1:11 AM
Genetic Engineering
DNA Technology and Genetic Engineering is not disproving God. Infact it proves the books sent by God to Humans for their better ment. Look and take a pause and think How little the modern man knows about human beings. He is at the threshold of this science. We know very little about the human body and its intricate working. But unfortunate we think that we have achieved everything in knowledge, and in frustration we proclaim that there is no God. It is our misundertanding and limited knowledge that compels us to say so.
Actually all these years of labour in various fields of science man has generated explosion of information and Data only. It is not real knowledge. Has this so called knowledge saved man from war, hunger, greed, hatred, dishonesty.....a big NO.

Is modern man free of worries than what our forfathers were?

Thus it is not true that God is not there, actually God exist except we are not able to prove Him. Perphaps Super String Theory and Quantum Mechanics solve this riddle.

with love
firdous wani
Lisa Houston Sep 5, 2010 9:41 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
I think, like most things, this idea seems great at the start, and then turns horribly wrong. for the use of curing diseases, preventing them from becoming hereditary, this is a brilliant idea. for living longer? i think people are selfish for saying life's too short. Nowadays, the average for living in the uk is about 70/80ish? say, 75 years. that is a VERY long time, people just complain because they wish they'd done something in the time they were given, not because there was not enough time to do it in. anyway, the point im trying to make is that there will be some sick people who would want to alter their genes, just so their baby could come out perfect blonde hair blue eyed.. im just thinking it could basically turn into the hitler idea.
Skye Aug 3, 2010 9:12 PM
Genetics
Okay well I think in a way this is a good thing, but like the comments before, it will cause problems with other people not being able to afford the treatment, and in a way it takes away the specialness of a having a naturally born baby, like your saying your not willing to have an imperfect baby, that they aren't good enough, but with some reasons, it may be good, say that you had cancer in the family, there could be a way that this could be genetically engineered and there for making it possible they wouldn't get cancer that way. But if you believe in god you shouldn't really have a go at someone else because that's what you believe and if someone else doesn't believe in that, thats what they believe.
katie Jul 26, 2010 3:04 AM
GOD <3 xxxxx
excuse me i am a christian and i find that very offencive how you talk to god in that way telling him to kiss your you know what. god is amazing he is the best thing that has ever happened to me in my lifexxxxxx i love him so much with all my heart, soul, mind and spirit. and there is one thing you should know GOD LOVES EVERYONE!!! nomatter who they are, what they have done and what they think of him he loves you sooooooo much he doesnt hate you he just doesnt like your behaiviour.
katie Jul 26, 2010 2:59 AM
PEOPLE WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU ALL?
GENECTICALLY MODIFIED BABIES IS WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! i mean having a baby is such a beautiful, amazing gift WHY WOULD YOU EVER WANT TO CHANGE THAT? it really people are very lucky to be able to have a baby i mean imagion someone who cant have one nothing could ever replace a baby. look at the human body we are all special and different not one person is the same WE ARE AMAZING! the heart pumping blood around out body, the lungs that help us breathe all these millions of cells doing different things but it is not just that our souls we have different personalities too. GOD DESIGNED US THIS WAY FOR A REASON WE ARE ALL SUCH BEAUTIFUL, AMAZING PEOPLE SO DIFFERENT FROM EVERYONE ELSE THAT IS WHAT MAKES US SO SPECIAL. HOW COULD ANYONE.... ANYONE WANT TO CHANGE THAT??????????
:S Jun 27, 2010 8:38 PM
catch 22
isnt it slightly ironic how we have the power to completley change who we are now?
but think, if we did that, how bad would descrimintaion become? everyone would be basically the same, and so those few people that turned out different, or couldnt afford to pay for GM would become the new "untouchables'
it in fact wouldnt be a step forward, but a step back.
we would be destroying all the racial equality that people have worked so hard for for decades.
Shane Jun 8, 2010 8:47 PM
Genetics are very important
I have to disagree with a number of people feeling that "God" made us how we are and we should just be happy and deal with that. If God did make me how I am...he can kiss my a**. I've been gay my whole life. Never once been attracted to women. I would very much like for them to figure out a way to genetically reverse homosexuality. I've read articles where they have successfully shut the "Gay" off in fruit flies...and have even been working on studies with sheep involving the same thing. I believe they successfully achieved the same in sheep. I understand that there are more complex characteristics chemically...in the human body, but I believe that one day we can achieve such a thing. There are many others that I know...that feel the same way
Anonymous Jun 8, 2010 4:43 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
Newsflash: God dosn't exist
bob May 31, 2010 10:12 PM
pros && cons
george clony ?

definatly to old
Vincent May 30, 2010 8:49 PM
God
I have always been a follower of God, but sometimes I just disagree with how he made me. It's not my looks, I just hate being a human, I hate that fairies are not real and unicorns, etc. If God asked my opinion I would tell him to change allot of things I really would like to be genetically modified with a smaller creature and get a dragon flies wings and maybe make my wings glow with the light bugs gene but my appearance is fine I would love to be genetically modified as the above if they discover how before my time.
kelsey shoup May 27, 2010 3:00 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
if we are able to "change" our genes wouldnt everyone just change into the person they want to look like? there would be no more unique faces. In a way this shows many pros, but this is going to far by messing with biology. its like a slap in the face to god
JeltenG May 19, 2010 5:00 PM
My God , we are in trouble
God knew that a time like this would certainly come. I am not surprised cos we are in the last days but we need to think thrice if not more.
JeltenG May 19, 2010 4:56 PM
madness
Wonderful, you know. But i think we are heading towards our end.Is man now God?
JR May 10, 2010 4:42 PM
Butternut Soup
Ay Butternut Soup is soo tasty. Mmmm yum yum.
:) May 5, 2010 7:13 PM
why?
why would people want to change what they look like? they should be happy about what they look like and not want to change i understand why people with diseases might want to and need to but people that are healthy all they care is about looking good and making sure there kids will too
Amanda Apr 26, 2010 4:27 PM
God is our creator
God is the only one who should be deciding on what our babies look like. He is the one who created us and should be the one to decide what gift he wants to bring us. We should be happy with the blessing of a baby whether it has diseases, inperfections, or if it is completely healthy. I believe it is wrong to try and change what God has blessed you with.
Mark boucher Apr 23, 2010 4:56 PM
Perfect people
If i customize my car its a one off full of expression.If I just have the same car as every one else it will all ways be the same .its better to be different .if we had genetic screening over 100 years ago some of the greatest mind of our time would not be here,and we would live in a world of dolly the sheep people,
max Apr 21, 2010 2:12 PM
This is the re design of our species
if this is tried on humans we have created a thing that destroys the very meaning of human i think we can do whatever we like to animals but not a sentient species like us
billy Apr 20, 2010 8:01 PM
God is not a factor
God is science. the bible is and always has been written and revised by humans. I believe in God but I dont believe that he made us the way we are if he did not want us to discover what we have. I think God itends for us to tweak his idea for life as do all inventors.
bob Apr 20, 2010 5:34 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
omg
bob Apr 20, 2010 5:33 AM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
i think this is total crap :) lol
Vincent Wright Apr 17, 2010 11:38 AM
To May Kadoodie
Well if you think half of us are to young to understand what genetic engineering is then why don't you enlighten us. Instead of being an idiot by trying to condescend us with a know-nothing comment, why don't you bring your intellectual argument to the table?
May Kadoodie Apr 16, 2010 2:06 PM
Okay,
half of you are too young to understand what genetic engineering is. And I love how everything to do with science is made it to an issue about religion. C'mon.
:P Apr 16, 2010 8:43 AM
Blahh
hahaha I didnt even read this . I think the whole subject is retarded. who gives a damn about genetically modified .. stuff .
Lynn Apr 15, 2010 9:05 PM
erm...
What I meant when I said religion isn't a valid reason to oppose genetic engineering, I meant by people who use that to CONVINCE me or other people to be against it. Example:

LYNN: Well, I believe human engineering could benefit the human race.
OPPOSER: Genetic engineering is evil. How could you believe that it could benefit us?
LYNN: Well, we could prevent disease, prevent genetic dissorders, *goes on for a little while*. But what are your reasons for being against it? Maybe you could convince me to support the other side of the argument.
OPPOSER: Genetic engineering is playing God! It defies the Bible! It... *goes on about religion forever*
LYNN: Erm, well, I'm not really religious. Do you have any other reasons?
OPPOSER: BELIEVE IN GOD DANGIT!!!! *hits Lynn in the head with a bible*
Lynn Apr 15, 2010 8:42 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
Genetic Engineering is a very controversial topic nowadays. On one side, we could improve the human race, eliminate disease, increase the life span, and possibly make a perfect human race. On the other side, there could be mass discrimination for people who choose not to do this, overpopulation might get worse, and of course, a scientists greatest enemy, ETHICS. Personally, I support genetic engineering, as of now. Oh, and by the way, I believe all you religous folk shouldn't use God as a reason to be against genetic engineering. While it is your belief, it isn't valid. (yes I have had people who tried to make me be against genetic engineering because it was "playing God")
raggle graggle Apr 13, 2010 12:47 PM
Why on earth??
Seriously people? wWhy on earth would you make your own baby? To make it the best kid the world? To make sure it was perfect? Seriously people. You're basically defying the laws of nature and God. Why would you even consider this? To me, the people who make their own baby are horrible, horrible creatures. But hey, that's just my opinion. And, I'm just a kid.
JQ Mar 30, 2010 1:41 PM
Nature needs to be left the way God intended
This is a terrible idea. We, as a people, are always going out trying to discover things. In the bible, we gain knowledge and wisdom through Adam and Eve eating the fruit which was the beginning of sin. And let's not forget the people who had the "knowledge" of trying to build a tower to reach to Heaven. If scientists start trying to play God then people are going to start thinking "What do I need God for." That's a no no and I'm against it. I would never put aside God for man because man will decieve you. Some things, if not most, are better left up to God.
bdbs Mar 26, 2010 1:43 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
ssssssssssssyuigfskfgsifgduiweioweuqwrtui38935
Jeff Mar 17, 2010 12:40 PM
Genetic Engineering
Have you ever seen Jurassic park?

Thats completely unrelated
Caey Feb 26, 2010 12:50 PM
God
Katie, you make a good point that if we start to create super humans through genetic engineering, mother nature will probably come up with some new disease that we can't fight. But, if god didn't want us to be perfect and have this technology, why is it that we have found the possibility of it. If god really didn't want something like this to happen, we would have never discovered this technology. If this technology becomes a reality, there will be discrimination from those who choose to use it and those who don't. But for the side that doesn't want to have genetic engineering, I'm not sure if anyone has brought this up but there are some scientist who believe that if we use this technology, the human race will not be able to grow. Genetic mutations are how we have evolved as a species and with genetic engineering, we will cease to have anymore gentic mutations except for those who don't choose to use it. Maybe mother nature will find a way to make the human race stronger than the genetically designed humans one day. Overall, genetic engineering is a choice but something that will have a lot of good and a lot of bad.
Arianna Martinez Feb 24, 2010 11:30 AM
Gene Therapy
I personally believe that gene therapy is NOT a good idea. First of all, increasing life-spans will just increase the risks of Over-population. Second of all, people will not be satisfied with using gene therapy just for curing diseases. They will want more and more and eventually lead to having Designer babies. This could lead to a life such as the ones lived in the movie "Gattica."
Hayley Feb 14, 2010 5:08 AM
RE: "Genetic Engineering is a Choice"
Sam, while you did make a point that genetic engineering is a choice, this would make a divide in the human race, those who are modified, and those that aren't. Imagine how much discrimination that would cause! The modified would look down on the "gene poor."
Soomin Park Jan 30, 2010 10:59 AM
My science discussion...(9th grade)
I had to write a science discussion board article, and this article helped a lot

When man decides to play god, what are the consequences? If humans want to tamper with genetic composition to create a being that is "near perfect", as the highest beings in the kingdom animalia, have no one to stop us but ourselves. We now have designer shoes, designer noses,and even designer babies. But to create a race of humans that are super human mutants due to genetic engineering just might spell out doom and segregation for those who are not. In the future, mankind might be divided among itself not because of the racial, ethnic, or religious differences, but because of the separation of little things, such as the very alleles in the chromosome ppairs. Even more, there might be problems with the birth itself (seeing that most of us are not designed to give birth to unnaturally smart babies with big heads. Jimmy Neutron, anyone?), population issues, and problem securing the basic necessities of life due to the longer living humans. Genetic tampering also enables us to choose genders of the fetus, and this, along with the odd preference of male children, may lead to female infanticide. Without females, who knows what evolutionary mutation we might go through? Or will we simply die out?
Vincent Jan 26, 2010 5:53 PM
Both sides of view
Well a healthy attractive intelligent (and maybe athletic) person is obviously going to be against genetic engineering as they will want to keep the place in society but then again people will use genetic engineering to make their "ideal child". Yes our world is overpopulated and yes living longer is desired by all but we have to face the uncomfortable fact that parents are selfish and want a child of their own despite overpopulation and all the kids live in an orphanage. Don't get me wrong, wanting to have your own child is perfectly understandable if you can have one but if someones body lacks the capacity the naturally produce then nature has probably selected that person to not have their own child for a reason.
Vincent, 17, Texas
D Hill Jan 13, 2010 10:06 AM
Genetic Engineering
I wonder if they can erase the gene for bad grammar and poor spelling.
Cindy Jan 12, 2010 11:04 PM
GE=The Worlds End
If genetic engineering where done on humans that would not be good for everyone. War could break out between Humans and GE humans. One envying the other and the other looking down on them. Genetic engineered humans could be targeted for the certain genes they have. Things could happened that were not perdicted leading to minor medical problems to death. Technologically we are ready to carry out genetic engineering but we are not ready for the responsiblity. GE will always have its cons like every thing else but we still do not have enough knowledge about it.
Sam Jan 7, 2010 7:22 PM
Genetic Engineering is a CHOICE
I think that Genetic Engineering shol dbe a choice, if someone believes that God created them that way and they should be hapy with what they have, but other people may want to live because a lot of genetic diseases are deadly like Sickle Cell Anemeia or sometimes even down-syndrome. Anyways, the option of having your genes altered should be up to you and your ethics.
Katie Jan 5, 2010 4:39 PM
Genetic Engineering
Although I can understand all the people who agree with genetic engineering completely; it will save lives, let us live longer, help prevent genetic diseases etc, I still think we should consider the other side of these arguments very seriously. Our planet is already dangerously overcrowded and if we cure all diseases, it will be even worse and our economy cannot deal with that many people, therefore mother nature will create another disease we know nothing about which will try to decrease our population numbers. No matter how hard we try and how much we want to, we will never beat death. People will always die and people will always be imperfect. The minute we start attempting to create a being superior to the way we are intended to be, we fail.
Why can't people just be happy with us a species? Can't we just accept that we will never be perfect and never be free from disease and death? It hurts when you lose a loved one, I know but it will always happen eventually, it is unavoidable.
I know I sound like the voice of doom, but there is just no point in doing this! I do respect other people believing in this because there are a lot of good points, but for me the cons outweigh the pros.
Katie, 15, Scotland
Brianna Jan 2, 2010 12:55 AM
genetic engineering
god made us the way we are ,we should love ourselves ,and its true we can help people with health problems,but changing the people apperances is just ridculous
Firdous A. Wani Dec 18, 2009 11:26 AM
genetic engineering
Dear Sir,
Genetic Engineering is a volatile subject. At present human race is uncertain about its pros and cons, perhaps that is the reason most of us are thinking with uncertinity about this technology. Let us gain confidence and expertise, like a child when he starts walking independently, by walking cautiously and slowly, till more knowledge and expertise is gained in due course of time.
thanks
Ben Dec 10, 2009 1:40 AM
a lot to consider
In response to RC and Martin; There are very many obvious pros and cons to genetically engineering humans. You must consider the different types as well. You could use it to cure many diseases which is great but the same technology could then be implemented to "improve" human performance which might also be great. For example someone with Muscular dystrophy or atrophy could possibly cured with gene therapy to restore muscle growth; then again the same "therapy" could be given to an athlete to improve their baseball swing. (without being picked up on a drug test for that matter.) I am 18 and Atheist as well- I really think that god and religion are another subject all together. Honestly I think the negative psychological, social, economic, political (and maybe even religious) outcomes that would ultimately and unavoidably result would vastly outweigh the benefits of saving lives and enhancing human abilities. The question is where do you draw the line. And it is not a very easy question to answer; us kids are going to have to figure this all out sooner than we think...
Writinggirl4 Dec 3, 2009 1:22 PM
Genetic engineering
This will go downhill most definently there will be a perception of the perfect person that will be used to make a child like that there will be rioting and protest there will be discrimination between genetically engineered children and non-genetically engineered children it will be like discrimination against black people again (no racism intended) it will be just awful. baah.
jordan Nov 25, 2009 4:44 PM
hi
hi guys my name is mordan an i need to now some relly good stuff to study with im in grade8
Halley (hailey////howie) Nov 25, 2009 4:41 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
Well I belive in god and every thing but I think that living longer would be a good thing becouse children with cancer would not die and there would be a longer life span to give more oprettunity and let people live there life.... thats all i have to say
james Nov 25, 2009 4:29 PM
RE: Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans - Part 1
hey im james and i found this fasenating
Brant Wade Nov 20, 2009 3:40 PM
Genetic Engineering
Hey I"m Brant! and I agree with genetic engineering it is an good way to do things :)
Ms. MPD Nov 17, 2009 2:42 PM
Genetic Engineering/Reply to Paul & RC
Ok, I am a Christian and athough I do believe God gives us free-will to heal, but I believe it is horribly wrong to play God and use this form of breeding. Too many people are in it for the wrong reasons, such as to create the "perfect child" All respect to any non-Christians, but there are just some things that simply shouldn't be done...
Vennila Nov 17, 2009 5:21 AM
WOW!
It's great. Hope everything quickly be available.
David Oct 27, 2009 10:25 AM
Genetic Engineering
to all of u genetic engineering should not be legal because it could cause mutations and then they would study it for the rest of its life and probly kill and how would the parents feel
rubberjesus Oct 21, 2009 1:45 PM
genetic engineering
the idea that somehow the rich will create a class of superhumans to dominate the lower class is simply ridiculous, sure genetic engineering will be expensive and only affordable to the rich at first, computers and cars were at first only toys for the rich but now are affordable even to the poor, whoever makes an affordable genetic engineering technology stands to make alot of money. Even supposing that the improbable happens and that genetic engineering never ever becomes affordable to the general public, the supermen theory still relies on rich genetically modified people only having sex with other rich genetically modified people which is also ridiculous, this is not aristocratic 18th century europe rich people and poor people regularly interbreed, so their genetic enhancements will fairly quickly make their way into the general population regardless of affordability.
RC Oct 21, 2009 1:38 PM
reply to all
In reply to Rajat's question, I have absolutely no idea!
I'm a 17 year old studying ethics and philosophy within religious studies, and am finding the course so interesting that I'm reading outside the subject as per say.
I do however back up Paul Arnolds question of why would anyone want to make humans stronger? I'm sure there would be people who could take research too far, but as I said in my previous post, this fear shouldn't cloud the positive reasons for research.
In reply to "christian martin", I myself am an atheist, so I don't believe God created us in the first place, but even with non-religious people there is always the question of whether genetic engineering could disturb the balance of nature or alter natural selection.
Also, assuming you're Christian, there are a few matters that could be raised to say that genetic engineering isn't going against God's plans or "playing God"
Firstly, genetic engineering wasn't around when the Bible got written (obviously!) so it depends how you interperate it. Also as Paul has already said, if God exists, he created us with free will, and the Bible also says that he made everyone of us with a plan for our lives before we were even born. If this is true, he must have planned for us to develop genetic engineering. Also, Christians are meant to follow in Jesus' footsteps. Jesus healed people, so does this mean we should do as much as we can to heal people too?
There are quite a few other points but this comment is long-winded enough, and sorry Paul if this wasn't the direction you planned for your article to go! I thoroughly enjoyed reading though, so thanks.
Paul Arnold Oct 16, 2009 9:11 AM
Reply to Rajat
An interesting question, but maybe others can comment on it as it leaves me with the question - why would anyone want to make humans stronger via genetic engineering? We have enough brainpower and technology at our disposal to make us as strong as we desire.

One fascinating area of research though is using gene therapy to make weak humans stronger - i.e. those suffering from muscle wasting diseases. We touched on it briefly in this article http://www.brighthub.com/science/genetics/articles/13247.aspx

Best wishes,
Paul
Rajat Oct 16, 2009 4:25 AM
genetic engineering
can by using genetic engineering, we make human strongest of the world?
my professer says it's not possible till suitable culture medium is obtained for animals/humans. so tell me how can we obtain the suitable culture medium to make a strong gene of man and wht's the procedure to make a strongest human of the world by using power ful characters containg genes of different animals in human gene by genetic engineering?
Paul Arnold Oct 13, 2009 4:31 AM
I reply to Christian
If there is a God then I assume he gave us free will and knew the directions our brains would take us in - and is pretty OK with that. As I mentioned in my article I believe that it is against human nature to stop this kind of research - whether that's a God-given human nature or otherwise.
christian martin Oct 12, 2009 10:13 AM
Genetic enginnering
U crazy?? God made uz ths way 4 a reason. DUH. We should just leav ths stuf along and let god mak us like he wat uz to b.
RC Oct 3, 2009 8:43 AM
Genetic Engineering
I see Ako's point of view that the class of "superiour humans" would be terrible, but this would only happen if genetic engineering was put in the wrong hands. The fear of changing peoples personalities, creating perfect humans with no quirks or difference between them, and the debate over whether genetic engineering could end up with a Hitler-like motive of what color hair parents would want their children to have, however, shouldn't cloud our main reasons for genetic research. Developing a deeper knowledge into human beings and rooting out answers could improve so many people's quality of life.
Ako Othmani Aug 31, 2009 4:52 AM
Genetic engineering
Genetic engineering is great for things such as health improvement by the sounds of it, but how far is too far? To use Genetic engineering to enhance humans personally is to create a class of superior humans who have a large advantage over the normal non-genetically enhanced for things such as jobs, and besides, there is no gene for fate.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend