Standards are set to align performance. They comprise objectives against which actual output is compared. There are two prominent performance measures. These are quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods. Both measures are inimical to the assessment procedures. As motivation increases productivity, the latter should be gauged accordingly.
Quantitative measure is done with the aid of statistical and numerical tools. These entail some calculations to arrive at a rate or percentage. The results are then interpreted as either acceptable or not acceptable. Favorable performance is either at par or above par. Unfavourable performance is obviously below par. This is likely reliable, being objective in nature.
Qualitative measure is done through testimonials. There are many sources to consider such as customers, co-workers, and the immediate head. Their statements are relevant to the expected functions of the employees found at the job description and specification. This is subjective in nature; careful scrutiny is advised.
No doubt, motivation increases productivity. It is but critical to upkeep consistency in the provision of extrinsic and intrinsic rewards for consistent performance.