Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This E-mail. Argh!

Written by:  • Edited by: Linda Richter
Updated Mar 4, 2010
• Related Guides: Going Green

Do what you can to conserve the environment. Just don't tell everyone in every e-mail to do the same.

A Philosophy, Not an E-mail Signature

More and more I see this line at the end of corporate e-mails - “Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.”

Mind your own business.

Like everyone else sharing this great earth, I am not adverse to any effort that improves the quality of life on the planet and reduces the overall impact we have upon it. But just because you have suddenly jumped on a green bandwagon (that your recipient may have even help build decades earlier) stop peddling your opinion in every message with an automatic signature tag line that somehow eases your guilt.

There may be a corporate need to print information. Printing costs money. It is in the best interests of the business to reduce such costs. Companies should minimize the use of costly resources to what is needed. For example, companies can use several green printing techniques to cut costs. If there was no cost involved, I would make a rule to print each email with that line and snail mail a copy to the sender. Call it a ‘read receipt’.

I mean, why stop there? Why not express your religious feelings in random messages? How about “Consider Allah before eating while it is still daylight out during Ramadan.” Or the ever popular “Consider the fetus before agreeing to an abortion.”

If you feel so strongly about such a campaign, include that philosophy in your corporate green policy. Publish that policy on your company web site if you need to show your position on the use of printers in other companies. A philosophy of conservation should be infused into corporate culture without the need to tell people what they already know over and over again.

Ironically, after more than a decade in IT without a printer, I finally got one this year. Please consider the recipient before sending this e-mail.


Comments

Showing all 26 comments
 
Christian Cawley Jan 30, 2011 10:39 AM
RE: Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This E-mail. Argh!
The extra bits generated by the offending text take energy to process, both when typed, sent, routed, received and displayed, thereby contributing to a greater degree to the pollution caused by power stations.

Keeping emails brief and to the point would be a greener way.
Cris Dec 17, 2010 10:45 AM
what's up with blogs from complainers
I love the line, the message of conservation is not just a fad, or for tree-huggers, we all need to get on this mindset, and I personally appreciate the effort of the people who bother to get the message out, even if it makes others feel guilty enough to complain. As for this article, stop your bellyaching! Do you not have any better material? This sounds to me like a teenager complaining. Teenagers complain about everything in a basic effort to define themselves and this sounds like a teenage blog to me.
Ms. Green Nov 23, 2010 2:42 PM
PS
And as a final note, I work in an office FILLED with people who are printing things because "that's how they always did it", not because they actually needed it printed. Just because a few shmucks think it looks cool for them to have that signature line on their email, doesn't mean everyone using that line is a shmuck. What a way to lump everyone into some stereotype. And what a waste of time to get so bent out of shape about a small line at the end of an email. A line meant to encourage people to change poor habits if they have them (hence the term "consider" in the line).

And yes, I DO use renewable energy resources (pay extra to have them), buy organic/local, walk/bike instead of drive (and take the Prius when I do drive), don't buy/use things in plastic, use low-energy electronics, and plan to install solar on my roof as soon as it's available in my area (or some kit I can build myself is available). So don't assume we're all hypocrites out here. Some of us really DO care and really DO invest in the future of everyone, not just ourselves.
Ms. Green Nov 23, 2010 2:33 PM
Renewable Resource?
In response to Rach:
- "More trees are planted every year than are harvested." And how are those trees harvested? Do men go out with axes and chop them down? No. Large industrial machinery run on a non-renewable resource is sent to do the job day after day.

- "Removing the demand for paper = less trees planted..." OR removing the demand for paper = less industrial machinery built, maintained, and run on non-renewable resources.

- "My company purposely does not include this line in our signature because we rather just encourage the recycling." Have you ever been to a paper company where they actually make paper? Have you seen the ENORMOUS machines? Paper machines are generally over two stories high - larger than most houses. That's one single machine to make one single type of paper (consider newsprint, tissues, cardboard, and all the specialties in between). What do you suppose those paper machines run on? Do you think they have little hamster wheels installed so animals can make the machines run? Or a bunch of guys turning cranks? Wrong again. These machines are run on non-renewable resources (coal, oil, and electricity from those sources) in ENORMOUS amounts.

- "An email can be reread over and over without the assistance of the Co2 emitted/wasted from the computer running..." I totally agree that this *could* be ideal. However how many people in the office first PRINT out their emails, then SHUT OFF their computer? When you find out about an office that does this, let me know, as I want to meet these people.

It's not about preaching some belief or looking down on people. It's about helping raise awareness of people. We all have wasteful habits, and having a friendly reminder from outside ourselves every now and again just might help us realize there is a better way of doing things than we've always done them. It's called EVOLVING, and it's a GOOD thing.
Karen McDermott Oct 8, 2010 2:49 PM
Hmm
The internet/computer-savvy may not go printing off every email they come across, but speaking from personal experience, many secretaries are asked to print off emails for their bosses to read (the sort of bosses who still haven't found the on-button). I think including a few more pixels in the form of an email signature doesn't harm anyone and it could help draw the attention of these technophobes to ecological issues.
Rach Sep 22, 2010 12:46 AM
Something to consider..
Paper is the most sustainable resource on earth. More trees are planted every year than are harvested - they are grown in plantations with the sole purpose of being cut for paper and wood, old established trees are not cut down.
Removing the demand for paper = less trees planted...
My company purposely does not include this line in our signature because we rather just encourage the recycling. And what will it come back as? More paper!

An email can be reread over and over without the assistance of the Co2 emitted or should I say wasted from the computer running for 8hours.
Recycling vs wasted emissions...
Just some thoughts!!
Emily Aug 28, 2010 6:55 PM
PS
How funny to read the comments and see all these self righteous "pro annoying comment" people telling the blog poster that the article is unnecessary and he should JUST IGNORE the message as it's not annoying.

UH... so why did they have to come in here and whine about how unnecessary this blog is? Why not JUST IGNORE it? Unlike an email, you have to go out of your way to read the blog, whereas the email with the self righteous, condescending, insulting message is dumped in your inbox.
Emily Aug 28, 2010 6:51 PM
Agree with Article
How arrogant and condescending are these people who ASSUME others are mindlessly running around printing email they don't need to print.

And if you could find someone stupid enough to do that -- how much of an overinflated sense of self importance do you need to possess to believe the type of person who would print something they don't need is going to stop doine that because you include an insulting mini-lecture at the bottom of EVERY email you send out?

When I see that arrogant, smug, self congratulatory little message at the bottom of an email I make a mental note to avoid doing business as much as possible with the company it came from. I'd really rather not associate with the type of people who think THEY are so superior to everyone else that we need them to "remind" us not to print something we don't need to print...

The message is rude, unnecessary, and often pushes the email to another page when it IS printed. Lame.
Anonymous Aug 13, 2010 11:00 AM
agree / dont agree because...
If the email ends up being printed anyway, the tag line require three lines minimum, resulting in wastage of more ink and possibly more paper!!!

its a show off line...
Crick Aug 3, 2010 3:06 AM
wow!
i was just looking for some advise on the signature before i propose that my company begins to us it coz we have real problems with people printing mail they don't even need. this forum is just weird, cant believe am here... but i will make my own rational decision based on experience. sensitize employees (especially) and associates (for their benefit as well) and send the tag line to remind. it has worked on me, i thought about all the garbage and costs to print and then get rid of the garbage in an environmentally friendly way, and now i print less, am sure it will get someone else too.
A Rodrigues Jul 16, 2010 4:19 AM
Philosophy? Or policy?
As the post states, "some corporate" emails include this text. If it is a corporate email then it is the policy of that corporation. As the majority of emails sent by a corporation are internal emails it makes all sense.
Also, the text says "consider", does not say "do not print". It is up to you to decide if you really need the print out, or not.
And this is nothing about god, or religion. This is about our planet. The place you would like to preserve (I hope) for your children.
In my corporation we have a documentation review workflow completely digitalised. However there are still employees that print the document, make their comments on paper and then spread copies to the other reviewers. This is wrong, against the corporation policy and makes all the money spent in a document management system useless. It makes all sense to remind the employees about such a wrong behaviour.
On the other hand having such a note in an email spread out of the corporation does not harm any one and works as an example for other corporations.
If you still believe this is just a philosophy you should start looking at the effects of human intervention in many places in our world.
Stephanie May 28, 2010 1:41 PM
.... so so ....
I found this article rather interesting,....

I printed 20+ copies and sent it around the office....
Dreengirl Apr 28, 2010 4:04 PM
People have to be reminded to think
News flash...concern for the environment is hardly the equivalent of worshipping a god that may or may not exist. Increased paper = more resources consumed (trees) = more garbage = more pollution....it's not a BELIEF it's a legitimate concern and if one person chooses not to print an email as the result of that tag, then the senders job is done!
Andrew Mar 18, 2010 12:09 PM
Hysterical
I love a good discussion that gets people talking. I agree with Matteo. This is not about the environment. I believe it's about whether or not it is appropriate to spout your personal beliefs on corporate emails.

As for the environmental points, you're simply not going to save the world by using signature de jour. I always wonder, "What are you REALLY doing to save the environment?" Are you still driving your SUV to work? Still using plastic bottles? Do you have solar panels on your roof? Employed any kind of energy conservation in your home... at all? Are you still using plastic bags at the grocery store? I'm not saying you're one of these people, but for the most part, it has been my experience that the people that use signatures like this are more interested in the popularity of the cause rather than the cause itself.
Erica Mar 3, 2010 2:54 PM
RE: Get a grip
I agree with Anonymous (both of them if not the same person), I think this person took a simple line of encouragment to make the planet a cleaner place and turned it into a reason to complain... you just wasted 20 min of your time on something that you could have easily ignored.
Liz Feb 16, 2010 11:44 AM
a matter of self consiousness
more or less I agree with the post.

using this message in signatures has become more of a marketing/show off tool, rather that an actual medium to reduce impact on the environment.
trust me, i know people who use this because it is "cool".

and afterall, it is a matter of personal beliefs (plus necessity of printing an email) and i doubt that the sender's signature can have any impact on the printing decision.
engineer Dec 22, 2009 5:31 PM
i agree with most comments
i think the article is written by a person with little to no understanding of the implications of saving our environment. i'm not a tree hugger, but actions that have an effect outside one's personal space and well being must be addressed by those on which they bear.
Andre Dec 9, 2009 5:29 AM
Annoying and pointless
I really had to join this discussion. I personally think these 'eco-lines' are even MORE harmful for the environment than one thinks. Every day, about 60 billion e-mails are sent worldwide. About 90% of it is considered spam, leaving only 10% 'good' e-mail. When you print an e-mail, about 60 lines fit on a page. Even if only 1% of all e-mails are printed, it means that ...
60,000,000,000 x 10% = 6 billion 'good' e-mails;
6 billion / 60 lines = 100 million pages of 'blah-blah-eco-stuff', assuming that this 'blah-blah' fits on one line;
100 million x 1% = 1 million pages of this stupidity is printed every day, worldwide! Looks like the 'greenies' are actually helping the paper-industry!
Of course some numbers are assumpions, but not exeggerated. I really can't emphasize enough to stop this bullsh... It's more useful to keep e-mails short and stop using stupid long signatures, just to feel good about it.
Jake Nov 27, 2009 6:33 AM
Argh indeed!
You have way too much time on your hands buddy, to ramble so much, yet offer nothing constructive.
Anonymous Nov 19, 2009 8:21 PM
blah, blah, blah
"I'm an elitist, contrarian blogger who's trying to get more followers by writing with my panties in a knot."

You need some serious anger-management counselling if a freakin' email signature gets you bent out of shape...
Barack Nov 17, 2009 11:05 PM
Idiotic Blog
Your blog post is just whining. That's why you get the type of responses like this.

Just ignore it and get on with your day.

You are obviously some conservative republican who isn't comfortable having it pointed out what you are doing to contribute to the devastation of our earth.

I bet it also makes you uncomfortable to realize that some people live in poverty while you do not.
Phil Oct 30, 2009 5:57 PM
amen
found this post while searching for the origins of this ubiquitous and annoyingly self-righteous sig. sad that your post doesn't shed any light, but i saw all the greenies hating and had to post.

to anyone who sends me an email asking me not to print their emails, STOP IT! i haven't printed more than a dozen emails since they invented the internet. please consider the children before you stomp any kittens on your way out of the office!
Jason Corder Oct 26, 2009 1:36 PM
This is my planet too!!!
You say "Mind your own business." Well its all of our business how this planet and it's resources are used.

Our society is a consumeristic society, we are virtually programmed to use things then throw them away and think its ok. Those that see the light have every right to try to shift the paradigms of our wasteful society. I applaud anyone who adds this message to their signature and have done so partially in spite of your rhetoric.
Scott Oct 14, 2009 7:47 PM
Hmmm.
Can't say I agree. I think that people have been conditioned to think in the moment and to think mainly in terms of convenience. Your tongue-in-cheek Allah and abortion references are both pretty major decisions that people would think carefully about. But printing out an email, when there might not ACTUALLY be a need to... well, sometimes a little reminder can help jar a person out of their rather wasteful routine and actually make them THINK about their actions.

In the effort to encourage a more sustainable society, it really is the little things that add up. But there are so many things that can be done to help the environment that's it is really hard to keep them all in your head at once. So a little reminder here and there is a good thing, not an imposition.

There really isn't anything pretentious or overbearing about eco-friendly reminders. It's not a political, ideological, philosophical or religious-type thing. Eco-friendly, sustainable choices are a simple necessity if we don't want to wipe out ourselves and the ONLY planet we can live on.
Anonymous Jul 25, 2009 12:27 AM
Get a grip
More effort was wasted writing that drivel than time taken to simply ignore the simple and frankly totally non-offensive signature.
Think and print Jun 24, 2009 6:39 PM
Quite the opposite opinion
You probably don't want to visit thinkbeforeprinting.org as I think they have the opposite view to you. They seem to be trying to get people to put the message on web pages and documents too.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend