
click to enlarge
The need for
color calibration among imaging devices, display devices, and printers is well-known, but such issues do not stop there; variance in their ability to display contrast adds another layer of complexity to the issue. Your digital camera’s LCD display and your computer monitor are extremely close in their displayable dynamic range, but the same cannot be said for prints. Tone mapping addresses this issue by executing a transform that takes the original HDR photograph and converts it to an image suitable for displaying and/or printing. Since this operation is after-the-fact and is not a one-to-one transformation, considerable latitude is given to the photographer to customize the final results. If you don’t like the results, you can always try a different tone mapping scheme.

click to enlarge
There are other strategies, though- Max Lyons’ PTAssembler, for instance, produces what he calls an
“extended dynamic range image” by carrying out a weighted average of all the input images, thus arriving at a result that bears more resemblance to the actual scene- the disadvantage is that it disallows creative tone mapping during the process. As you can see by the photographs, the HDR image shows much more contrast, but is noticeably more extreme in that regard than the actual scene. Which path you choose really depends on your artistic inclinations.