Anionic surfactants, the major cleaning agent in most laundry detergents, are not generally absorbed by inorganic solids. Cationic surfactants, on the other hand, are strongly absorbed by solids, particularly clays. There is also a significant degree of absorption of both anionic and non-ionic surfactants in activated sludge and organic river sediments (ukmarine.org.uk, 2001).
This means that the most commonly used surfactants in laundry detergents need to be decomposed in sewage treatment plants before they are released into the environment. If they are not decomposed before the treated water is released they will be found within the water supply since they will not be absorbed by natural surfaces in the water ways.
According to industry reports, the biodegradability of surfactants that are in modern day use are considered by the industry to be adequate when sewage is properly treated. Even so, these same reports state that a certain percentage of the anionic surfactant molecules will indeed pass through the sewage treatment process unchanged. These molecular toxins are being released into the environment every day from even the most efficiently run sewage treatment plants. These molecules are not necessarily benign in nature, and have all been shown to exhibit toxic effects at sufficient concentrations.
Also, surfactants which contain branched hydrophobes (long water repelling carbon chains) are not as easily biodegraded as the more common surfactants which contain simple linear hydrophobes. An example of a branched hydrophobe would be the cationic surfactant that is used as a fabric softener. A much larger proportion of these surfactants will be released into the environment from sewage treatment plants.
The nonionic surfactants nonylphenol and some of its ethoxylates are not degraded very easily during sewage treatment. The prime source of their presence in the environment arises form their incomplete degradation in sewage treatment plants (Mihaich, 2003). These surfactants have been banned by the EU, yet are still considered acceptable for use in the United States. In Europe the environmental toxicity of these substances has be demonstrated but industry scientists in the United States have painted a different picture. As a result, no restrictions on damage to our environment by these toxins have been brought to bear.
References:
Mihaich, E. et al; Relative Toxicity Ranking of Nonylphenol Ethoxylates and their Degradation Intermediates to Estimate Cumulative Hazards and Risks [Internet] Kansas City, MO: AOCS; May 7, 2003. Available from:(www.aperc.org. )
Ukmarine.org; UK Marine Special Areas of Conservation; Surfactants [Internet].UK Marine SACs Project, UK; 2001 Available from (http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/activities/water-quality/wq8_46.htm)
Ukmarine.org; UK Marine Special Areas of Conservation; Surfactants [Internet].UK Marine SACs Project, UK; 2001 Available from (http://www.ukmarinesac.org.uk/activities/water-quality/wq8_46.htm)
< BACK to Green Laundry Detergents: First Understand What is in Laundry Detergents