Which is the Best Free AntiVirus? AntiVir Versus Microsoft Security Essentials - Part 1

Article by Donna Buenaventura (8,660 pts ) , published Sep 24, 2009

I put AntiVir Personal Edition and Microsoft Security Essentials head to head. Read this detailed antivirus comparison to find out which of the two antimalware performs better and which is the best.

Overview

Avira AntiVir Personal Edition is one of the widely-use anti-virus protections that you will find in millions of PC and often recommended to end-users looking for free security solution. Microsoft Security Essentials is the new kid in the block and has garnered good detection rating in AV-Comparatives.org review (beating other popular antimalware scanners). Let’s compare the two applications that will not only protect your computers from malware but will help you in browsing securely.

Installation and System Requirements: Winner – AntiVir PE

Microsoft Security Essentials (MSE) and Avira AntiVir Personal Edition (AntiVir PE) will work with Windows XP, Vista and 7. AntiVir continue to support Windows 2000 and what is great is you can install it in a Netbook! Installing AntiVir let you customize which component to install and how you want the program to protect the system while MSE do not offer such. Both programs require no reboot after installation which means you are protected as soon as the installation has finished, you can start configuring and using the malware scanner. No registration is required to continue installing any of these programs but Microsoft will need to validate if your Windows has passed the Genuine Advantage program.

User Interface: Winner – Microsoft Security Essentials

The UI of AntiVir is actually good but comparing it with MSE, the latter is neater and will not confuse beginners to start configuring the program or which is safe to change.

AntiVirus Task Scheduler and Memory Usage: Winner – AntiVir PE

With AntiVir PE, you can create several scan and update tasks within the program. MSE only allow you to modify the single update and scan task.

AntiVir is lighter to use than MSE: AntiVir will only use 57MB when running a full system scan while MSE’s memory usage during a scan is 73MB. When the programs are idle, MSE will use 4MB while AntiVir will use 1.3MB only.

Scanning Performance: Winner – Microsoft Security Essentials

When I run a system drive scan using the programs’ default scan settings, MSE finished scanning in 45 minutes and 12 seconds with 434,750 files scanned. AntiVir has scanned 362,326 files in 23 minutes and 45 seconds. Changing the scanner of AntiVir to use maximum heuristic analysis resulted to 3 false positives after it scanned a total of 362,985 items.

Note: MSE’s scanner offers heuristic detection but no option to disable/enable it. No false positive by MSE after the system drive scan. The 3 false positives by Avira are text files of IE-SPYAD and Website Watcher.

Images

3 False Positives by AntiVirNo False Positive by AntiVir using default settingSystem Drive Scan by MSE

Features: Winner – AntiVir PE

MSE features its real-time protection against malware and spyware, heuristic detection, e-mail attachments scanner and browsing protection. AntiVir will offer the same except e-mail scanner (this feature is available only in paid edition of AntiVir).

AntiVir also provides anti-phishing protection and Secure Start protection which is quite useful because any identified malware is removed before the system will continue to load. However, both programs do not offer web shield against rogue and malicious websites (unless the website will download or load content that is malicious).

MSE and AntiVir let you run a quick, full, single (via context menu) and custom scanning. You can customize the scanner of AntiVir to use normal or higher scanning process which means it can finish fast but will use more memory or use lower memory but the scan will take longer to finish. This option is not available in MSE. AntiVir has the option to run a boot records scan.

13 Comments

Showing page 1 of 2 (13 Comments)
Nov 9, 2009 9:32 PM
rover3500
Avira is my choice
I use the paid version of avira(premium suite)...I've tried most security progs,and my 1st 2 choices are eset security and avira for speed and detection.Shame kapersky so slow,or would recommend that.The new forticlient suite (free)doesn't seem bad,but haven't had a long time to test it.
Nov 6, 2009 5:58 AM
mw
"Best" implies "Better than any other"
When comparing only two things, "better" is the right term - "best" should only be used when comparing three or more things.

If you're going to ask "Which is bwst?" you should include more candidates - like, say, AVG or any or all of the other free anti-virus programs.

I won't use AntiVir, because of the popups, and i won't use MSE until is see a few more reviews.

So far, i'm sticking with VG - i have no problem periodically downloading and installing upgrades manually. (On my Windows 7 RC1 system, i have Windows Update set to "Notify Only" and i decide whether i want it to download and install updates.)
Oct 22, 2009 11:46 PM
Danny D
... prolonged usage...
I was never a fan of Microsoft and it's products, but I would have to choose MSE. You can't rate a program after you installed it, and ran some tests (which might of been craftly chosen). Use them for a month, or more, and then you will see how annoying a program can get, and how effective the other might be. I'm sure not everybody will agree with me, but keep this in mind. Microsoft, a huge software developer, has made a free antivirus. Not a trial version, and not a watered down version that doesn't have all the options that a Pro version might. And, it's very easy to use, effective, and fast.
I wouldn't worry for those that don't have a legal version of Windows. They probably already have an illegal version of an antivirus, or, maybe even MSE. :)
Oct 19, 2009 7:27 PM
Kevin
MSE
MSE ... AVG ... AntiVir ... they all are free and all do a good job and I don't have a problem recommending any of them. However, MSE has one big advantage over the others - Windows Updates.

I've used AVG for years but about once a year they come out with a major version change (for example, from 7.x to 8.x) which requires downloading and basically reinstalling. Since MSE using Windows Updates this shouldn't be a problem.

For users who need to install an AV and forget about it I feel more comfortable recommending MSE than the other products.
Oct 18, 2009 11:13 AM
Don
Seems skewed to me...
I've used Avira Free and Avast! Although Avira appears superior in detection and the pop-up really doesn't bother me, what always drives me away from Avira is their horribly slow servers for the Free Edition. Avast! is excellent as well, and their servers are equally fast for the Free Edition as well as the Paid. I recently dumped Avira from my Netbook, and installed MSE. So far, so good - it's the Beta machine for MSE. If I continue to see good things, I may move one of my other systems to it. And, WGA doesn't bother me, as each laptop and desktop I own has a valid and licensed copy of WinXP. In this case, I totally agree with Microsoft.
Oct 9, 2009 5:45 PM
Schmeckel
RE: Which is the Best Free AntiVirus? AntiVir Versus Microsoft Security Essentials - Part 1
Thank you Tim, looks like I download and use MSE. I use Vista, MADE my MS, only make sense. Plus, I don't like popups and MSE looks cooler.
Oct 7, 2009 3:33 PM
Tim
Genuine Advantage
The difficulties some have with WGA are of course unfortunate, but it seems to me that every one of the causes of invalidation has legitimate cause. If you installed windows on more than one computer (virtual machine or not), you've violated the terms of use. If you bought a used computer, you should have had the sense to buy from someone reputable. That list can go on and on. Bad or pirated software... nobody can pin that one on Microsoft. Deal with your own problems.

The very core of my preference to MSE and "Avast!" has been that both offer 100% free software. Too many people have become accustomed to the fact that "popups happen". This is intolerable for myself. The software is the guest on *my* computer. I am not guest on the *software's* computer.

Altogether, I simply prefer to avoid annoyance where I can.
Oct 7, 2009 10:54 AM
Tim
Apologies
Yes, I see that I misread the section about the UI.

I have no invested interest is MSE. I do enjoy the fact Microsdt has no reason to give me popups to up-sell me to any silly Pro version though, which finally lives up t the fact the virus protection should be both free and available without pretense that I willbuy a bigger better product after 30 days, etc.
Oct 7, 2009 9:28 AM
Nobin
RE: Which is the Best Free AntiVirus? AntiVir Versus Microsoft Security Essentials - Part 1
Mr. Tim, please comment to such knowledgeable articles only after reading it properly. It's very clear from your comment that you don't have a great taste on Avira but on MSE.
Miss Donna had written that "UI of AntiVir is actually good but comparing it with MSE, the latter is neater and will not confuse beginners to start configuring the program", meaning UI of MSE is not confusing.
There are many people who would like to have able/disable features for their own reasons.
Anyway this article was quite knowledgeable and I expect more such articles from Miss Donna.
Oct 7, 2009 5:26 AM
RE: Which is the Best Free AntiVirus? AntiVir Versus Microsoft Security Essentials - Part 1
Which is why MSE wins in the Installation section in the review :)
http://www.brighthub.com/computing/smb-security/articles/50054.aspx
Showing page 1 of 2 (13 Comments)
 
Subscribe to Computer Security
RSS
Get free weekly updates, directly to your inbox.
Subscribe
Browse Computer Security