Core i5 vs. Core i7: What's the Difference?

Article by M.S. Smith (39,333 pts )
Edited & published by Rebecca Scudder (13,042 pts ) on Feb 8, 2010

Since it's release in early September, 2009, the Core i5 is being branded as the mainstream version of Intel's Core i7. So what are the real differences between Core i5 and Core i7, and how do Intel's two product lines compare?

Core i5: The New Middle Class

The new Core i5 processers were released in September 2009. As the name would suggest, these processors do not represent a new architecture but rather a mainstream release of processors based on the Nehalem architecture, which were previously only available only as part of the Core i7 line.

Of course, the marketing of the new products indicates that they are intended to be seen as less capable products than the existing Core i7 processors. But marketing often sacrifices truth for simplicity. For example, Intel currently offers numerous products under the Pentium name, but these products are in fact Core 2 Duos and very similar to the Core 2 Duo branded products. Is Core i5 simply a marketing term, or does it indicate fundamental differences in the processor?

The New Socket and Chipset

Core i5: Nahalem for the mainstreamOne of the most importance differences between Core i5 and Core i7 is the use of a new socket, known as LGA1156. This new socket will also be used by some Core i7 products, but current Core i7s use the LGA1366 socket. The new LGA1156 socket is partnered with a new chipset, the P55. As those who follow computing would guess, the P55 is designed as a mainstream chipset. This means less features, but lower cost. While the new LGA1156 socket and P55 chipset are important, they alone won't be responsible for any major performance difference.

In the future, the Core i5 line will remain on the LGA1156 socket, although Intel could add some varients of LGA1156. Core i7 will be split between LGA1156 and LGA1366. A new product line, called Core i9, is anticipated to debut on LGA1366 only. These will be super-premium processors with at least six cores.

As of January 2010, Intel has also debuted the new H55, H57, and Q57 chipsets. These chipsets are lower-end chipsets aimed for use with the new Core i5 600 series processors. They are not significantly different from P55, but they do not include a integrated GPU. This is because the Core i5 600 series processors include a GPU on the processor die.

Turbo Mode

Something which will be responsible for a major performance difference is the improvements in turbo mode. The original Core i7 processors came with a turbo mode which allowed the processor to essentially over-clock itself automatically when some cores were not being used. The Core i7-965, for example, could hit 3.46Ghz when the turbo mode was fully active. Its stock speed is 3.2Ghz.

Intel has said this will be enhanced with the new Core i5 products as well as with the new Core i7 860 and 870. The Core i5 750, for example, should be able to accelerate from its stock speed of 2.66Ghz to speeds as high as 3.2Ghz. This is a substantial improvement, and it allows new Core i5 processors to perform as well as current Core i7 processors in applications that only use one or two cores. For more in-depth information, read a full review of the Core i5 performance.

Triple-Channel DD3 and Dual-Channel Memory

The original Core i7 products, and their associated X58 chipset, main use of triple-channel DDR3 memory. This meant that it was best to purchase RAM sticks in multiples of three. This is a turn off to many users because it makes RAM less flexible and requires more spending upfront. Gamers may enjoy spending the money to see the i7 really perform.

Core i5, however, uses traditional dual-channel memory. This should make RAM less expensive for most users. Some new Core i7s will also support dual-channel memory instead of triple-channel. The performance difference should be insignificant for most users.

Difference in Hyper-Threading

Another significant performance difference is how the Core i7 and Core i5 products will be handling hyper-threading. Hyper-threading is a technology used by Intel to simulate more cores than actually exist on the processor. While Core i7 products have all been quad-cores, they appear in Windows as having eight cores. This further improves performance when using programs that make good use of multi-threading.

Some Core i5 products have this feature, but some do not. Currently, the Core i5 750 does not have hyper-threading, but it does have four physical cores. The dual-core Core i5 products, on the other hand, do have hyper-threading.

In either case, the end result is that no Core i5 products has or will have more than four physical or simulated cores. This means that Core i5 products will not be as quick under heavily multi-threaded work loads as Core i7 products.

i5 vs. i7: What it Means to Consumers and Power Users

Old champions, like the Core i7, will be challenged by Core i5Overall, the new Core i5 processors are far more evolutionary than revolutionary. While these new processors are actually quite a bit different from the Core i7 processors currently available, many features, such as the enhanced turbo boost and dual-channel memory, are shared with new Core i7 processors. The difference between Core i5 and Core i7, then, will be somewhat dependent on which particular Core i7 one is comparing Core i5 to.

Even so, Core i5 is clearly meant to be a more mainstream processor. Those who use their computers for heavily multi-thread applications will miss hyper-threading and the triple-channel memory, which means that a Core i7 on an LGA1366 socket will be best. For most us, however, Core i5 is more cost effective (it's available around $200), and quite adequate for our needs.

Core i3 vs. Core i5

Core i3 is now out. If you're wondering how the Core i3 and Core i5 processors are different, check out our Core i3 vs. Core i5 comparison article.

47 Comments

Showing page 1 of 5 (47 Comments)
Feb 8, 2010 1:30 PM
James
i5 Hyperthreading
I work at a retail store and people tell me everyday how the i5 does not have HT. I have read numerous articles that claim this as well.

However, when you look at the i5 line-up on Intel's site, it clearly shows that only the i5-750 does not support HT. It is also the only i5 that is quad-core.

All other i5 models are dual core, with HT enabled.
Feb 6, 2010 8:17 PM
yash
i5
smith thx a lot but i still have a doubt ... pls help me out a bit in detail
firstly de features dat i have posted have de i5 430M processor n u ppl have been talking about i5 540M ... well does that make a big difference????

secondly de ati graphics that is posted says 1 gb but i m getting wid 512mb ..

do dese 2 points make a major diff ??
and in de end u said i5 wid ati sounds gud ... if u dun mind xplain technically .... y ??
Feb 6, 2010 12:34 PM
george
i'd like 2 know: which is better4 video editing and gaming
i do video edting, graphic design and gaming, which is better? would any1 plz give me a useful suggestion?
Feb 3, 2010 11:40 PM
Re: Yash
That looks nice to me. Core i5 + ATI graphics? Looks awesome.
Feb 2, 2010 8:33 PM
yash
i5
it is dis one .....
MODEL : Acer AS5740G-434G64Mn
CPU : Intel Core i5 430 (2.26G/3MB/1066FSB/64-bit)
SCREEN : 15.6 Inch WXGA (HD) Wide Screen CrystalBrite (1366 x 768, 8 msec response)
MEMORY : 4GB DDR3-1066 (2 x 2GB)
HARD DISK: 640GB 5400rpm SATA
MEDIA DEVICE: DVD Super Multi (Dual Layer)
CARD READER : 5-in-1
WIRELESS LAN: 802.11b/g/N
BLUETOOTH : Integrated Bluetooth with EDR 2.0
BATTERY : 6 cell standard-capacity battery
VIDEO GRAPHICS: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1G dedicated DDR3 VRAM)
TV TUNER : None
CAMERA : Acer CrystalEye webcam featuring Acer PrimaLite with enhanced low light technology
OPERATING SYSTEM : Win7 Home Premium
MODEM/NETWORK : 56K/Gigabit
USB PORTS : 4
Feb 2, 2010 8:26 PM
yash
i5
if u have seen the i5 released by acer it says :
Acer Aspire 5740G - 434G50BI / Core i5 430M 2.26GHz / 4GB / 500GB / Blu-ray BD-ROM Combo / 15.6" / Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit / Laptop / Notebook (LX.PMB02.093)

m.s. smith u said that according to budget n many oder features i5 all the way ....
but in this one check the processor and then comment whther shud i go 4 dis one ??
reply as soon as u can.
Jan 26, 2010 7:13 AM
Necessary Evil
@Nitin Reddy Katkam
The difference of 200 dollars can be worth it if the applications you use can utilize it.
Better graphic card is also subjective as it depends on your applications(except when you are a gamer where you consistently need to upgrade to run the recent games).
SSDs are still in its phase of evolution and I dont see much point in spending that high on them for all of us. Of course they read faster, are more silent, more stable, more resistent to extreme handling(in notebooks) and less chances of failures overall. But apart from being more expensive you get much less capacity. Also the writing capacity is not as fast as in their cheaper counterparts.Their performance is impacted by availability of free programmable blocks and also the performance may degrade with use. So I dont see them as a utility for all f us!
Jan 26, 2010 6:46 AM
Steve
@Necessary Evil
I noticed a lot of people wonder why the i5 processors are cheaper than the i7 for the stock power... In your case, you presented the "i5-540M" and the "i7-720QM".

The difference here is tricky. What intel did was release dual-core processors running under the i5 architecture.

If it's a quad-core, the name will have a "Q" in it, like the i7.
Jan 23, 2010 12:23 PM
Nitin Reddy Katkam
Re: iMac 27 inch i5 vs. i7
The difference of $200 between the two doesn't really justify the additional cost if all that differs is the processor. You might as well spend it on a solid state disk (SSD) or on a better graphics adapter.
Jan 23, 2010 12:04 PM
evemar
advice
I use CAD and GIS systems that process huge files.
I need more performance in a single process (I would like it uses all processing as possible to perform that, even it would block other task until finish it, instead of run other things together).
Thus, some people adviced me to get an i7 920, others say that i7 860 is better becouse its clock is higher (860-2.8 x 920-2.66 please see http://www.gamevicio.com.br/i/noticias/30/30755-intel-core-i7-860-vs-i7-920-fight/index.html), and others suggestted me that a core 2 duo 3.2 Ghz will get the best performance…
What shoud I do? Any advices? Maybe some core i5?
Showing page 1 of 5 (47 Comments)
 
Subscribe to Hardware
RSS
Get free weekly updates, directly to your inbox.
Subscribe
Browse Computer Hardware