Imaging a Black Hole

Written by:  • Edited by: RC Davison
Published Jul 30, 2009
• Related Guides: Black Holes | Radiation

One of the more frustrating aspects about black holes is that by nature they are "unobservable," sort of. If they swallow anything within their event horizon, including light, how are we to observe them? Especially when they tend to accrete massive amounts of gas and debris around them?

Introduction

Black holes are a finicky lot. They are thought to exist at the center of most active galaxies and are predicted to exist by general relativity. What we theorize black holes to be are supermassive objects "power[ing] galactic nuclei by converting the gravitational energy of accreting matter into radiation" (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v455/n7209/full/nature07245.html). But, there's a problem currently with proving the existence of black holes - we cannot see them. We have seen the effects of intense gravity (See the article about Stellar Motion around the black hole located at Sagittarius A* at our galaxy's center.), but nothing definitive yet as to what exactly is the cause. Theoretically it is possible to observe the presence of a black hole by a process known as "gravitational lensing," an effect predicted by general relativity, whereby light from some source travels from the source and is bent by the extreme gravity of an object, such as a black hole or a galaxy. In the case of a black hole, as the black hole comes between some distant bright object and an observer the image of the object will grow in size, making it appear larger, and brighter due to the change in angular size while in line.

An illustration of the gravitational lens effect.
click to enlarge

However, there is a tremendous amount of electromagnetic radiation emitted from the activity near black holes, and so the most promising possibilities in observing black holes are in the range of x-ray and radio frequencies. What we are actually trying to observe is a relatively small silhouette amongst massive amounts of bright, hot matter. Quasars, which are massive conglomerations of bright, hot matter located at the center of some very distant galaxies, are currently thought to be caused by the gravity of black holes at the center, feeding off an accretion disk of matter and subsequently converting that energy to radiation. Inconveniently for us, this incredible amount of matter near a black hole also serves the purpose of clouding most any imaging of the black hole silhouette.

X-ray telescopes and radio telescopes are our best bet currently for observing black holes. The most recent efforts in imaging black holes have been attempts to image Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole thought to occupy the center of the Milky Way.

Efforts in Radio Astronomy

The most promising effort yet in radio astronomy to see the Sagittarius A* is the linking of three radio telescopes over a stretch of 2,800 miles (one in Hawaii, one in Arizona, and one in California), which forms essentially one large radio telescope. This is done using a technique called VLBI, or very long baseline interferometry, which unites three simultaneous observations, creating one image from one enormous "virtual" telescope with incredible sensitivity, capable of imaging details 1,000 times finer than the Hubble telescope.

The telescope is working at frequencies near 1 millimeter, a wavelength that cuts through much of the cloudy matter near Sagittarius A*. There have been images taken already, although the results thus far have been ambiguous as to what actually is at the center of Sagittarius A*, although evidence is hinting that whatever it is it does have an event horizon, and is not glowing with massive amount of infrared radiation, both bits of evidence are what we would expect if there is a black hole there.

Showing page 1 of 2

 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend