A Human Evolution Timeline

Article by Emma Lloyd (13,028 pts )
Edited & published by Leigh A. Zaykoski (8,355 pts ) on Jul 2, 2009

Human evolution happened over such a long period of time that it’s difficult to comprehend it. Looking at a human evolution timeline—an outline of the development of our ancestors—can provide the necessary structure, and also demonstrates just how long all of these events took.

Millions of Years Ago

 

4000: The development of organic molecules.

 

3900: Prokaryotic cells (resembling early bacteria).

 

2500: First organisms to use oxygen.

 

2100: Eukaryotic cells (more complex single celled organisms).

 

1200: Evolution of sexual reproduction—recombination allows for faster evolution.

 

600: The earliest multicellular organisms evolve. These were thought to be a primitive type of sponge.

 

580: Cnidarians—the first organisms with nerves and muscles—may have been the first multicellular organisms with movement.

 

550: Flatworms—the first animals to evolve a brain.

 

530: Pikaia, a type of worm, was the first animal with a notochord (a primitive type of backbone), and is thought to be an ancestor of all vertebrates.

 

505: The first vertebrates—a species of jawless fish related to modern lampreys.

 

480: Placodermi, the first species of jawed fish.

 

400: Coelacanth—the “living fossil,” so-called because the species is still in existence today.

 

375: The first lobe-finned fish.

 

365: Some species of freshwater lobe-finned fish develop legs, evolving in shallow-water and swampy habitats. Lungfishes retain some characteristics of these early tetrapods.

 

315: The first known animal with recognizable limbs—Acanthostega—is believed to be the first capable of coming onto land, but it was poorly adapted for this habitat.

 

300: The earliest known reptiles were around eight inches in length. The amniotic egg allowed the evolution of reptiles which could reproduce on land.

 

265: Two branches of reptiles split off. Diapsida evolved into modern reptiles. The other, called Synapsida, evolved into the earliest mammal-like reptiles, known as Pelycosaurs. These evolved into Therapsida.

 

220: A subgroup of Therapsids called the cynodonts began to evolve more mammalian characteristics, including jaws which more resemble those of modern mammals.

 

220: One group of cynodonts is thought to contain a species which is a direct ancestor of all modern mammals. These early mammals were small and fed mainly on insects, and likely had milk glands and a constant body temperature. The neocortex (the newest part of the cerebral cortex) evolved in these first mammals.

 

125: Eomaia scansoria, the descendant of placental mammals

 

65: A group of nocturnal, insect-eating mammals begins to split off into three distinct groups, one of which will evolve into primates.

 

40: Primates split into two groups: Strepsirrhini and Haplorrhini. The latter includes apes, monkeys, and tarsiers.

 

30: Haplorrhini splits into two groups— Platyrrhini and Catarrhini. Platyrrhini migrated to South America, becoming the New World monkeys, while Catarrhini remained in Africa.

 

25: Catarrhini splits into two groups—the Old World monkeys, and the apes.

 

15: The apes split into Hominidae (which will become the great apes—orangutans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans) and the gibbons (lesser apes).

 

13: Speciation (evolutionary divergence) of orangutans. Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, thought to be a common ancestor of gorillas and humans, had a wide, flat ribcage, stiff lower spine, flexible wrists, and flat shoulder blades, all adaptations which helped the animals climb trees.

 

10: Speciation of gorillas.

 

7: Speciation of chimpanzees. The last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees is Sahelanthropus tchadensis. The so-called “Millennium Man,” Orrorin tugenensis, is the earliest known human ancestor which post-dates this speciation.

 

3.7: Australopithecus afarensis leaves footprints on a layer of volcanic ash in Laetoli, Kenya. These footprints indicate that the species was most likely bipedal.

 

3: The evolution of the bipedal australopithecines in the African savannahs. Over the next million years this hominid species loses its body hair as it becomes fully bipedal.

 

2.5: The genus Homo appears, evolving from australopithecines ancestors. The development of the Homo genus coincides with the appearance of tools in the fossil record.

 

1.8: The evolution of Homo erectus, in Africa. This species resembles modern humans and is thought to be an ancestor.

 

1.5: Human ancestors began to use fire as a tool.

Continue to the next page to see what happened 1,000 years ago...

Thousands of Years Ago

700: A common genetic ancestor of Neanderthals and humans is thought to have lived at this time.

355: Homo heidelbergensis, common ancestor of humans and Neanderthals, leaves footprints in a layer of volcanic ash in Italy. The species was similar to Homo erectus, but had a larger brain-case.

195: Omo I and Omo II, two fossil specimens discovered in Ethiopia, lived at this time. They are the earliest discovered fossil evidence for ancient Homo sapiens.

160: Homo sapiens living in Ethiopia near the Awash River are known to have practiced mortuary rituals.

150: The woman known as “Mitochondrial Eve” lived at this time, in East Africa. This fossil is the most recent common ancestor of human females.

70: The development of genes associated with speech. The development of “behavioral modernity,” a set of behaviors and traits associated with modern humans. At around this time, the development of modern human culture began to accelerate rapidly.

60: The “Y Chromosomal Adam” lived in Africa. This fossil is the most recent common ancestor of human males.

50: Humans begin to migrate to South Asia.

40: Humans begin migrating to Europe and Australia.

25: The Neanderthals die out.

12: With the extinction of Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens becomes the only living species of Homo.

10,000 BCE: Humans begin to develop farming in the “Fertile Crescent,” a highly fertile crescent-shaped region in the Middle East which includes Ancient Egypt, Ancient Mesopotamia, and the Levant.

11 Comments

Showing page 1 of 2 (11 Comments)
Feb 12, 2010 1:26 AM
david Russell
Plenty evidence to support such facts
Some of the readers above seem abit confused or lack information on the human evolutionary timeline. If they are then a huge amount of evidence exists in the form of DNA analysis (see the National Geopraphic Genome project), archaeology, paloantology. If you want to understand HOW things can be dated, then look up books on carbon dating and information in other 'radioactive clocks'. It is also worth looking into embryology. There is an overwhelming abundance of evidence in all these fields and others concerning human evolution. Take the time and go and find out for yourselves.
Good luck
Feb 2, 2010 1:18 PM
Paule
RE: A Human Evolution Timeline
Hey how bout the christian, bible lovers take some time and look into evolution, look at the facts, look at the pictures, its obvious that there is some simularity between us and animals. i doubt that "god" made us to look the same. unless he wanted to just start some controversey. so get your nose out tha damn bible and get it into a evoltionary book.
Dec 18, 2009 7:09 AM
Dogg
Neanderthals
Neanderthals are alive and well, they usually come from anglo-celtic, middle class families, where they commonly see no need for evolution or change and are usually so insular in their views they cant see past their own egos or worlds to stop and see the rest of the world has moved on from superstition and explanation of the world as existing because of an imaginary friend in the sky. No need for evidence or reason. Neanderthals prefer ignorance.
Dec 14, 2009 1:07 PM
Larry
human evoltuion?
Yeah, this is all crap. Ever heard of Creationism?? That's where it's at!!!
I don't even see how you can believe in evolution. It's complete non-sense!
Oct 30, 2009 9:25 AM
sia
speciation of homo sapiens
please give me article abuot speciation of homo sapiens
Oct 30, 2009 9:24 AM
sia
speciation of homo sapiens
please give me article abuot speciation of homo sapiens
Oct 26, 2009 7:19 PM
Lilac12
human evolution
I think god created evolution which created adam and eve. Whoever opposes that needs to have a pretty convincing backup story. So I believe in the bible and science and if anyone calls me blasphamos, they are wrong.
Oct 12, 2009 8:04 PM
Annonymous
Not real!!!!
GOD created the heavens and the earth. Evolution is not real. God created everything. Stop making up excuses for not beleving in god! He is as real as you or i. Pray for god to come into your heart and forgive you for all your sins. Beleve in the one true god, and not this lame excuse!!! And where you there ?
Aug 12, 2009 4:15 PM
Evolution Timeline...
...and we're still evolving! Let's consider humankind in generations to come, whether or not we'll still inhabit Earth, what do you think we'll look like in a million + years? What if we look like the aliens, the little green and gray guys? Or, what if that's actually us coming back through time to take samples of our DNA, etc. so that we can sustain life, either on another planet, or simply to create new life or a new species, either here or somewhere across universe? What a great movie this would make! But,what an expensive budget it would take!
If my production company could afford to produce such a large budget of a film, I'd do it. But, hey, I could write it!
Jul 1, 2009 2:08 PM
Chinmay
'Fact'
affirm46:

I would just like to mention that we humans have developed techniques to estimate the time of the happening of a particular event based on the observation of processes of aging around us. Anthropologists and archeologists, geologists use these techniques to predict the time of a particular event from the available evidence.

Just as the time of the happening of a crime can be predicted in crime investigations, there are 'factual' techniques that are very useful in time estimation - such as accumulation of sediment layers on rocks etc. And these ways have been tested so many times over and over again, compared to the writings found.

The nature of science encourages competition taking into consideration the basic human nature to analyze. E.g. if i make a discovery about certain cheat codes in a game, someone will try and beat me at it. The same way scientists try and outdo each other and the experienced researchers are the referees.

Therefore I think that these theories may be more credible than what critics say.
Showing page 1 of 2 (11 Comments)