Nuclear DNA is relatively longer than mitochondrial DNA reaching up to 3 billion base pairs compared to the estimated 16,569 bases pairs of mtDNA. However, scientists in the early 1990s proposed the use of mtDNA and its applications have greatly improved because of its size, its large number of copies within a single cell, its numerous sequence variations and its hypervariable (greater number of polymorphism) region. This higher number of copy of mtDNA in a single cell makes it extremely useful for forensics experts to extract them and process them for mitochondrial DNA typing particularly in cases where there are limited resources and samples. In addition to this, there are kinds of biological materials that are often present in crime scenes such as teeth, bones and hair shafts that do not contain nucleus but posses mtDNA hence making identification possible.
Aside from the number of mtDNA that can be extracted coming from small amount of samples, mitochondrial DNA proved very helpful in forensics because of its mode of inheritance. In humans, the mtDNA are strictly inherited from the mothers, therefore relatives that come from the same maternal lineage like brothers and sisters, mother and daughters will possess the same mtDNA, this will hold true in the complete absence of mutation. Because of this, relatives can directly supply mtDNA for forensic identification. However, this advantage of the mitochondrial DNA is, ironically its loophole. With the use of mtDNA in analysis, it will not be able to distinguish and even identify evidences and materials that do not come from the same maternal lineage which nuclear DNA analysis can easily provide given the right amount and kind of samples.