<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.brighthub.comhttp://www.brighthub.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Project Management</title><link>http://www.brighthub.com/office/project-management.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><item><title>Six Sigma: Myths and Realities</title><link>http://www.brighthub.com/office/project-management/articles/17717.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:16:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b133e95a-c263-4882-8f2a-b24547eff78e:17717</guid><dc:creator>Nbaker</dc:creator><description>This article by Natasha Baker, summarizes the main points in the research paper, Six Sigma&amp;#58; Myths and Realities, which takes an antagonistic look at Six Sigma in an effort to help organizations evaluate its worth. Is Six Sigma All It&amp;#39;s Cracked Up To Be&amp;#63; Taking an antagonistic approach in Six Sigma: Myths and Realities , author Nihar Raj...</description></item></channel></rss>