Project Management Methodologies: How Do They Compare?

Written by:  • Edited by: Michele McDonough
Updated Jun 25, 2010
• Related Guides: Project Management Methodology | Six Sigma

The world of project management and its practices is vast. With so many methodologies available, which one is right for your project? Here, Jean Scheid takes a look at project management methodology comparisons and the question: Do they compare at all?

Types of Methodologies

Handshake by Spring Stone
click to enlarge
From Agile methodology to Waterfall methodology and everything in between, the realm of project management and its methods are there for the taking. Project management experts everywhere will argue one is better than the other depending upon types and sizes of projects. Is that really true or can you utilize any methodology for any project?

For this project management methodology comparison, we will cover the following:

  • Agile Methodology
  • Waterfall Methodology
  • Agile Versus Waterfall
  • Change Management
  • Risk Management
  • Quality Management
  • PRINCE2®
  • Six Sigma/Lean Six Sigma

Certainly some of the methods listed here are obviously comparable, Agile/Waterfall and Six Sigma/Lean Six Sigma. Still, experts hold seminars, debates, and discussions of great length on whether the United Kingdom’s PRINCE2 or Agile are the same or vastly different.

For the project manager, however, is one methodology better than the other or can you get to a successful completion of your project using any one of them?

Agile Methodology

Though Agile was first utilized in IT projects, the bottom line on Agile methodology according to a simplified method I wrote is, “using the best process through empowered teams, customer involvement, and the ability to analyze and quickly control changes to the project scope at inception and throughout the lifecycle of the project.”

Whew, what does that even mean? Basically, using Agile management in a project helps you define the project clearly with stakeholders and team input, sprints or iterations assigned to a small groups, effective project monitoring, immediate change instead of constant review, along with constant communication throughout the project. Essentially, in my article Agile for Dummies: Making Sense of It All, a process at a auto service center that took 12 steps to complete was re-evaluated using Agile, cutting the process down to only 4 steps. Simply put, Agile cuts project bottlenecks.

Waterfall Methodology

Burney Falls by Agreene12 Wikimedia Commons
click to enlarge
Using the Waterfall process in projects means once the project scope is defined, you’ll be assigning teams with clearly set goals and timelines. Each team handles different aspects or modules of the project and this method is typically used in software development. Once a module is deemed usable, it is passed to the next team phase.

The completion of a Waterfall project literally lands in the client’s lap. Critics of the sequenced based Waterfall method claim it doesn’t allow for change control if something is wrong during the project process. If team A passes to team B and then to team C and team C finds a problem from team A, it’s hard to go back. Still, because of it’s linear approach, some prefer the Waterfall method if good client input is achieved early on.

Agile Versus Waterfall

In both the Agile and Waterfall methods, an iteration or module is not passed on until it’s done and experts will tell you in Agile and Waterfall that "done means done." The true difference between the two is that in Agile projects, evaluation of a module is present before it is passed along. In Waterfall, there is no stopping and the project flow passes along and along with hopes of a good outcome. Many project managers have their druthers about which is best. However, in Waterfall, if end-testing doesn’t go well, you better think about starting all over again. Read more on Agile Vs. Waterfall right here on Bright Hub.

Continue on to the next page to learn more about change management methodology, risk management, quality control, PRINCE2, Six Sigma, and Lean Six Sigma.

Showing page 1 of 3

Comments

Showing all 6 comments
 
Jean Scheid Feb 14, 2011 12:45 PM
PMBOK
We did include some management methodologies from the PMBOK, specifically change, risk, and quality management. With so many methodologies to compare--we chose the most utilized by today's project managers.
Nina Feb 14, 2011 12:20 PM
Methodologies
Interesting list & information but incomplete. Project Management is a process of processes with a start & finish. Doesn't matter when documentation is being done or if a customer is called a stakeholder -they mean the same. If a project goes on & on, but with a new subset of components to assess, develop, test.....it is still a project. If you're just maintaining a process without addressing new issues, target, design or new set of objectives, it is no longer a project. A project manager/leader is no longer needed, hire a coordinator.

By the way, where is PMBOK on this list? Was there an objection to the use of this methodology when this list was first initiated? I do not think all stakeholders were researched for this article.
Bill Duncan Oct 16, 2010 12:26 PM
Deeply puzzled
Deeply puzzled by the suggestion that waterfall methodologies don't allow for changes.

Deeply puzzled by seeing DMAIC and DMADV characterized as "phases." They describe the steps involved in applying Six Sigma concepts to manufacturing processes or to design processes. They may be (and generally are) used independently.

Deeply puzzled by the lack of any real comparison of methodologies.

But I do agree with your conclusion. As I wrote in the original PMBoK Guide ... it's up to the PM team to decide what is best for each project.

Fanatical supporters of the various approaches do more harm than good.
andile Sep 21, 2010 6:18 AM
RE: Project Management Methodologies: How Do They Compare?
hi, I'm interested in you updates
J. Verhuyck Jul 7, 2010 7:44 AM
Methodologies?
While the article has its merits, you can hardly call it a comparison of project management methodologies.

While, Prince2 certainly is one, PMBoK is nowhere to be seen, as isn't Systems Engineering or RUP for example.

I like the inclusion of Agile; while so many call it a PM methodology, it really isn't - although concepts of it can be extremely well-used embedded into a more complete method like Prince or PMBoK.

What bothers me most though, is the observation that Change, Quality and Risk Management, as well as Six Sigma are seen as PM methodologies while they really aren't either. They all have very specific purposes and applications, but they surely do not fill the requirements necessary to have them called a PM methodology.
ali May 29, 2010 5:31 PM
system methodology
may ALLAH bless you . I am a last minute .com man
i just got da answer for my assignment
cheers
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend