The Value of Project Management Certification

Article by begeland (87 pts ) , published Aug 26, 2009

What does PMP certification mean for employment and for the Project Manager? Is it valuable, is it necessary and does it separate good project managers from bad project managers?

Today's Market

A lot has been said and written lately about PMP certification through the Project Management Institute (PMI). In today’s job market, positions are becoming harder and harder to obtain, fewer postings are available on job boards and when positions do arise, thousands of resumes from applicants all over the country flood the HR departments for every single position.PMI Logo - PMS 300

With no end in sight, it’s important understand what’s happening with hiring organizations and how PMP certification affects your job search. At this point, the article sounds like it’s going the route of being a PMP certification proponent. Nothing could be farther from the truth. In fact, I am a staunch opponent because I think it is big business for PMI and is being used poorly and in a very lazy fashion by overworked HR departments as a means of weeding out candidates when, in fact, these companies are primarily hurting themselves by overlooking some of the best and most experienced candidates available.

The PMP Process

Let’s first look briefly at the PMP certification process before we go any further. In it’s simplest form, obtaining PMP certification means you passed a test by answering 61% or more of the answers correctly. It also means that the candidate has studied PMI materials and has some documentable real-life PM experience so as to be able to sit for the exam in the first place.

Does this mean that the newly certified PMP individual is a competent project manager? Certainly not. It also doesn’t mean they are incompetent. It means that they understand the PMI practices and terminology enough to have passed the exam and would bring into the organization a general understanding of the PMI processes and lingo. If your PMO is strictly based on PMI methodology, then you will know that the candidate will come in with an immediate familiarity with the processes in place…though they may have never successfully practiced them or may not have yet successfully led any projects at all.

The Hiring Process

It’s unfortunate in these economic times that hiring managers and HR departments are forced – or choose – to submit to practices interviewof weeding out candidates initially based solely on the existence or non-existence of PMP certification. I see it as a poor practice and a very lazy practice that HR departments have fallen into. However, it is happening and in many cases it may just plain be necessary to wade through the multitude of applicants that appear for each and every available job.

Conclusion

The message this sends to the very qualified and experienced applicants who have, say, 15 years of successful PM experience but no certification is – stop, study, and take the time to get the certification. Play the PMI game if you want to make it past that first round with many of the hiring organizations out there. It may not be good practice on their part, but it is what’s happening and therefore if you want to increase your chances, you’ll likely have to go along with it.

Comments

Sep 22, 2009 10:59 PM
George Chan
Yes depends no
With all things being equal, EXCEPT that of PMP certification. Who would you hire?

I agree that if HR based EVERYTHING on PMP certification, they may not have their most awesome candidate. However, if HR's duties is to satisfy a requirement of a candidate with PMP certification. Then they would have performed their job duties...

I can go on forever about this... I remember saying this about a college degree, I'm smarter and do more than that person with a college degree and get paid half the $$! Why's that?!

Anyways.. PMP certification is a good way to know that the PM candidate "should know" how the PMP process goes... A PM w/o the PMP may be limited to performing projects only within his/her current organization because of the familiarality of the company's Organizational Process Assets... ;)

(yes, I'm studying it... now...)
Aug 26, 2009 11:17 PM
Thanks for the comment
Kristina-

Thanks so much for commenting. Standardizing the discussion is one thing, but to use it as a sole weed-out tool for PM positions is poor practice but unfortunately it's one that is happening a large amount of the time right now. I think it's lazy on the part of HR depts, but I also understand they are overrun with applicants due to the job market. Still not a good excuse though.

Nearly all of the good PMs I know and have worked with are not certified and the ones that are have been like you - almost no mention of it.

Thanks again.
Aug 26, 2009 7:45 AM
Kristina Podnar
Excellent point on PMP Certification - Couldn't agree more!
Thanks for this post - it is what I seem to discuss very often with colleagues, who like myself are PMP certified, but do not use the PMP behind the name nor mention it at any other time than in job interviews of proposals.

Unfortunately, many have gotten used to asking whether one has this certification, hoping it is the magic bullet, when in reality you can find some duds with PMP certs, as well as gems who have never even considered sitting for the PMP.

While the premise of having a standard for the industry is a good one, you are correct about it being a large marketing effort and good business. I keep hoping that there will be an honest to goodness evolution of the craft and understanding that project management is not learned through a book - like any good management, it can't be done without practice, without the successes and failures, and obtaining that "gut feeling" when things start to go wrong.

So thanks again - great summary of many points I have heard and made myself!