Snorkel Rice – Is this the Solution to Rice Production Dilemma in Flood-Prone Countries?

Article by ciel s cantoria (3,903 pts ) , published Sep 25, 2009

The “snorkel rice” has gained worldwide attention when it was touted as the rice crop that could feed millions. Countries in Asia and Africa are greatly affected by extreme changes in weather conditions; hence, their rice productions are met with problems. Can the "snorkel rice" be the answer?

What is Snorkel Rice?

A new strain of rice plant is said to grow “snorkels” and can elongate at a fast pace as a way of surviving flood waters. The “snorkels” appear as hollow pipes in between two nodes and enables the rice plant to survive even when submerged underwater. This has great impact especially for countries in Asia and Africa where flash floods often occur, causing vast majority of their rice crops to drown and die.

Accordingly, the “snorkels” enable the rice plants to breathe underwater while submerged even for two weeks. This new strain was invented in the Philippines and is the subject of further research by scientists in Japan. Although dubbed as "Snorkel rice that could feed millions" there are still controversies surrounding the propagation of this new rice strain.

For one, the rice is not expected to yield in great numbers hence, scientists in Nagoya University are still in the process of introducing the “snorkel” genes of this rice plant to more responsive high-yielding rice varieties. They estimate that the “flood-friendly” rice will be available to rice breeders in three to four years time in its full bodied capacity as a Genetically Modified (GM) crop.

Environmental Issues Against GM Foods

120px-Gealypic5

In the Philippines, the International Rice Research Institute studies are being challenged by climate issues. How will the farmers be able to raise high yields of water-dependent crops when food-growing areas are subject to climate changes in a short span of time? A food growing area can be flooded today but can turn parched in the weeks ahead.

However, the challenges met by this rice variety are not only its ability to survive harsh weather changes and capacity to produce high yields. Its very nature as a genetically modified produce poses several environmental challenges. In fact in the Philippines, the Greenpeace Movement and other nongovernmental organizations have been successful in getting the Philippine courts’ approval to bar the entry of “GM or Genetically Modified“rice into the country.

What is Genetic Modification (GM)?

Genetic modification is a process in genetic engineering wherein a gene that possesses a desirable trait is identified and isolated with the aid of restriction enzymes. These enzymes are found in bacteria which have the ability to cut the DNA as part of its defense against invading viruses.

The isolated gene with desirable traits will be introduced to a recipient plant or animal and once it becomes part of the genome or full set of genetic information of the recipient, the plant or animal is now recognized as genetically modified. In order to produce a high rate of success for the introduced gene to combine with the genes of its recipient, the gene modification process requires the use of antibiotics and vaccines.

What are the Environmental Issues Against the Snorkel Rise as GM Food?

  • GM foods are known to cause allergies especially among children.
  • The development of antibiotic resistance that can affect the ability of the body to respond to antibiotic medications if and when needed;
  • The unknown effects of the genes in other organism that may feed on it or cross breed with it. It is feared that this can affect biodiversity since this is tampering with natural processes of the flora and fauna and possibly even the soil.
  • Monopoly or domination of related food production by a few companies;

There are several more issues raised against GM organisms including that of its advantage as a pest resistant crop. If pests and insects are said to be adversely affected by genetically modified crops, then it will basically have the same effect in humans. Hence, if pests partake of our food crops and flourish by benefiting from them, it is indicative that the same results will happen to humans if pests and insects die as they feed on GM crops.

The bottom line is why do we need to produce genetically modified rice to feed the millions when this can also cause the death of millions?

* Photo courtesy of wikimedia commons

Comment

Oct 14, 2009 8:38 PM
craig malinowski
GM once released, will persist longer than the fallout of chernobyl
I have objection to GM crops.
The placing of genes from bacteria or fungi,
in plants may be able to produce miracles.

It may also produce nightmares.

As with nuclear power, radioactive waste and contamination of land, sea, and groundwater,
once it has happened,
there is no turning back.

Now we depend upon it.

The contamination of genes,
is often cited as being a 'better' alternative to
application of pesticides.

Gene contamination will be as permanent,
as radioactivity, and only the future will tell.

I would hope for caution,
and such miracles as
"Snorkel Rice?"
sound great.
For me they are marketing sellers,
and I see the same could be achieved
using flood defences, irrigation,
and changes brought about through the use of
man power, and organisation, education and
funding the development and improvement of land management.

GM, offers miracles,
it offers laboratory solutions,
that can be extended to massive markets,
and provide massive profits.

There are no mass profits in ideas,
or land management programs.

I would avoid GM,
in favour of carefully planned thought out solutions,
and take advantage of nature,
that evolve and are considerate of their impact,
on the surrounding areas.
The miracles that nature offers,
and methods, that men came to find useful,
are being aborted daily, as chemical solutions
overthrow the inferior production methods.

The end result is often a period of sustained profit,
soil exhaustion, monoculture,
loss of insects, and nature is replaced
by a biologically dead environment.

I would prefer such technologies were confined to growing in desert regions.

Taking a fertile productive land and poisoning it,
and killing all the natural world that was,
it seems to me to be a waste.

I cannot be alone,
in my thinking.
I feel quite sure that if the GM people were confined to the deserts,
then the world would be thankful in the future.

This is unlikely,
and as persistent pesticides kill off the bees,
does it really matter any more?
 
Subscribe to Environmental Science
RSS
Get free weekly updates, directly to your inbox.
Browse Environmental Science