Why Storing Carbon Dioxide Underground Can Not Work

Written by:  • Edited by: Niki Fears
Updated May 20, 2011
• Related Guides: Carbon Dioxide | Co2 Emissions | Methane Gas

The last part of the series looking at the clean coal myth, showing why there is no such thing as clean coal by examining the dangers and problems with storing deadly carbon dioxide gas underground.

In the first part of our series on the clean coal myth, we looked at what exactly is meant by the term clean coal and what technologies or methods are being used in the industry that has been coined “clean coal”. In this final part of the series, we take a look at a key element of that process which involves the storing of CO2 to see what the environmental and safety issues are with the cap and store method utilized by so called clean coal plants.

What Will So Called Clean Coal Plants Do With the CO2 Emissions?

Clean coal proponents claim that capping some of the emissions of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) from coal burning plants and storing that hazardous greenhouse gas underground will make coal clean. As we have already discussed, this simply is not true. Even with this technology a dangerous amount of CO2 will still be put into the atmosphere polluting the air and worsening the greenhouse effect. But in addition to this, the proposal of underground storage of CO2 presents several other problems and hazards involved in both the actual capture and transport of this deadly gas into the underground storage areas as well as the storage itself.

Can You Safely Pump Carbon Dioxide Underground?

First, we will look at the process of actually pumping Carbon Dioxide underground. The industry proposes that this gas should be stored in underground coal seams. However, pumping the gas into these coal seams presents a variety of dangers. Many of these areas have concentrations of methane gas, another lethal and extremely volatile greenhouse gas. The pumping of Carbon Dioxide into these seams can release the deadly methane into the area contaminating the atmosphere and proposing substantial risk to humans and other life around the areas.

This also runs the risk of leaking not only toxic gas but dangerous metals and other elements that may exist in the coal seams that can contaminate not only the air but the soil and ground water sources as well. Since the majority of drinking water available for humans comes from ground water sources which are already being threatened this could be a serious problem.

Is Complete Containment of CO2 Gas Possible?

Natural Leaking

Even if the carbon dioxide could be transported and installed in the underground seams safely, there is then the matter of the storage itself. It is naïve, perhaps even a bit arrogant and ridiculous, to believe that we can honestly store a gas underground without any leakage. Even a very subtle slow leak which is bound to occur with any storage method, will still negate any supposed benefits that the idea of storing CO2 proposed in the first place. However, this leakage would not only present the standard problems of CO2 emissions in relation to global warming, but the deadly gas would also threaten humans and other animal life and plant life in the areas where the leaks occurred. Gas will naturally leak from any surface, that is simply how it works, so storage of the CO2 is merely shifting the problem from the plant creating the gas to the storage area.

Mammoth Mountain:

Mammoth Mountain, in California, has taught us this lesson. Although plants in the normal “breath” cycle absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen back into the air, they can still be affected by the gas when it leaks into the soil from underground, which literally begins to suffocate the roots of trees and other plants such as in the case of Mammoth Mountain. The leaks in Mammoth Mountain were also responsible for lethal build ups of carbon dioxide in poorly ventilated buildings. Since carbon dioxide is an invisible and odorless gas it can often become quite deadly before anyone is even aware that there was a problem with the leak in the first place.

Seismic Activity:

You then have the problem of worrying about seismic activity and geological processes. Something we can neither control, prevent, or accurately predict. Large seismic disturbances, or even smaller scaled activity could potentially release large quantities of deadly CO2 gas, poisoning water supplies, endangering the lives of people in near by communities, and wreaking havoc on the environment.

Conclusion: Coal Is Not Clean!

When all of the special interest groups want to tell the world about how safe and clean coal is, they conveniently leave out the amount of CO2 that even the so called clean coal puts into our air, the fact that it is one of the leading causes of global warming, or that thousands of miners have died in cave ins, methane explosions, and health related illnesses due to coal which continues to endanger the healths of everyone living in coal mining towns and communities where coal burning facilities are used. They also leave out the fact that truly storing the gas underground without consequence with full containment is not even possible in the first place.

With all of the evidence out there about coal and the clean coal initiative, some of which we have looked at in this series, it is clear that that is nothing clean about coal. And the snake oil salesmen who are trying to get the public to buy this myth are merely risking your lives and the health of our environment in order to line their own pockets with even more of your hard earned dollars. Simply put, clean coal does not exist.


Comments

Showing all 2 comments
 
Science Student Aug 26, 2010 6:44 PM
Unclean coal
Thank you for the article Niki, it was very well-written.

Hopefully this knowledge can reach the public somehow and we can begin to phase out coal. I'm still interested in hearing exactly what percentage of greenhouse gas emissions are eliminated by burning coal with these cleaner methods. While most people won't recognize the call to dismantle all major CO2-producing industries we may be able to use "clean coal" as a temporary fix to lesson our environmental impact, at least until we can transition to renewable energy.

I'm not entirely convinced that CO2 storage in nautral gas beds is an entirely hopeless procedure. While definitely not a permanent solution, it may be a good interim fix that gives our economy the time it needs to fully transition to renewable energy. Test results on carbon capture and storage will be interesting, to say the least. Keeping in mind industry's motives and our inability to model the long term though, it will be difficult to trust these test results at all.

Again, thanks for the article.
Jay Feb 6, 2010 1:32 PM
coal is not clean
Dear Niki , thank you for exposing the myth of 'clean coal' . I do not pretend to be a scientist ,but
the theory behind capture/store certainly is a real hazard and in my mind , it is completely insincere for the industry to state that it is ok on the very grounds you point out.
Coal historically did make the industrial revolution come of age and living easier , but in the present ie, post industrial , we must harness technology , employ renewable s ,there is no other reasonable solution . Thank you for setting the record straight .
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend