Server-based Computing: Trends and The Key Vendors of Virtual Servers

Written by:  • Edited by: Bill Bunter
Updated May 7, 2010
• Related Guides: Microsoft | Vmware | Virtual Server

Server-Based Computing has come a long way in the past few years. Competition has steadily increased in the Virtual Server market. Besides servers, several players have started offering Tools and Virtualization services to enhance user experience. Here we compare the offerings of three major players

History of Virtualization

Virtualization is, in essence, a very simple concept. Think of it as something similar to the oven in your kitchen being replaced by a centralized oven used by multiple residents in an Apartments complex, or using the laundromat instead of using your own washing machine. The concept behind this is improved utilization of a resource, with the attendant benefit to the users in terms of cost saving as a byproduct. In this sense Virtualization, in the context of computing, was first developed in 1960 to partition large mainframe hardware for better hardware utilization. Virtualization was first implemented more than 30 years ago by IBM as a way to logically partition mainframe computers into separate virtual machines. These partitions allowed mainframes to “multitask”: run multiple applications and processes at the same time. Since mainframes were expensive resources at the time, they were designed for partitioning as a way to fully leverage the investment.

However, with the advent of inexpensive x86 desktops, serves and thin clients paving the way for distributed computing during the 1980s and 1990s, the need for multitasking was gradually eliminated. Again, with the broad adoption of Windows and the emergence of Linux as server operating systems, Virtualization was effectively abandoned.

The challenges cropping up with these x86 deployments included Low infrastructure utilization, Increasing physical infrastructure costs and IT management costs, insufficient failover and disaster protection, and high maintenance enterprise and end-user desktops. In 1999 VMware invented Virtualization for the x86 platform to address these challenges.

Current Trends

Virtual Server
click to enlarge
Server-based computing world has witnessed a sea change in the past few years. Over and above the cost savings, the benefits of Green servers have become a key driver for this market, and we now have several players offering different virtualization technologies. With a variety of innovative tools and vitualization services on offer the market size has seen phenomenal increase. Several open source software solutions have also come up. According to recent research from IDC, the virtualization services market is expected to grow to $11.7 billion by 2011, as data center managers struggle to address power and cooling issues and the need for increased capacity ans sustainability

Besided addressing the needs of corporate users, what is new in this market in the past one year is that Virtual Machine (VM) server technology is now available and has also become more attarctive for SMBs for four reasons:

  • The capabilities and reliability of the Free versions have improved substantially
  • Prices have dropped
  • Setup and Management are becoming easier by the day
  • The technologies available help in reducing power and cooling, leading to green computing

Major Players

The above factors have also resulted in a healthy competition even among the lead players in the market. Thus, if we analyze the offerings from the top three players:

  • VMware Server
  • Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2, and
  • Citrix XenServer

four path-breaking trends in enhancing customer experience become evident.

  1. Hypervisors have become widely available: Microsoft, Citrix and VMware now support embedded hypervisors or Virtual Machine control programs (Intel's vPro, and AMD-V), making installation much simpler. HP Proliant servers also offer built-in support for Citrix XenServer.
  2. Increased Interoperablility is clearly visible: Novell's ZenWorks VM Manager and Orchestrator offer a way to manage more than one vendor's hypervisor. Microsoft's SystemCenter, CA and others have announced pland to support both Microsoft's and VMware hypervisors.
  3. Prices are coming down, and Functionality is improving: Even free versions are packed with features to drive the market into earlier adoption.
  4. The Vitual Server channel has widened with more partnerships and better expertise being available for consulting.

Thus the future holds a lot of promise for virtual server-based computing proliferating more and more, and Green computing and Sustainability Management becoming the order of the day.


Comment

Showing all 1 comments
 
Adam Feb 22, 2011 11:37 AM
Terminal Server (SBC) vs. VDI
It's important to differentiate between Terminal Server and VDI. The fact is that Terminal Server has advantages over VDI, while VDI also has advantages over Terminal Server. That's why most organizations are best served by adopting a hybrid approach, with an optimal mix of Terminal Server (for task-oriented users), VDI (for power users), and Blade PCs (stock traders, graphic designers, etc.) which delivers the most benefit and platform flexibility to the organization.

Ericom Software's PowerTerm WebConnect facilitates this hybrid approach by managing access to Terminal Server, VDI and Blade PCs, all with one management tool, one product.

For more info on the hybrid approach visit:
http://www.ericom.com/vdi_wts.asp?URL_ID=708

Adam
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend