What Are Opposed Piston Engines?

Written by:  • Edited by: Lamar Stonecypher
Published Jan 10, 2010
• Related Guides: Combustion Chamber

An engine with a special type of arrangement, opposed piston engines are supposed to be known as the most stable engines in the market today.

Introduction

Opposed Piston Engine is a type of diesel engine which has two pistons working in the same cylinder. Technically, opposed piston engine is just a variation in the design of conventional engine. Each of the cylinders of the engine has two pistons, one at each end. The main advantage of opposed piston arrangement over others is that they have a higher power to weight ratio.

opposed 

Construction

As mentioned earlier, in an opposed piston engine, there are two pistons at both the ends of the cylinder. The cylinders of opposed piston engine are generally longer in size than those of the conventional engines. The arrangement of cranks is also such that both the pistons move towards and away from each other simultaneously. Moreover, the system works on a two stroke cycle and a uniform method of scavenging. In opposed piston engine the combustion chamber is the space left between the two pistons when both are at inner dead centre positions. It is this place between the pistons wherein the fuel injection valve, air starting valve, pressure relief valve and indicating cocks are fixed.

Most of the opposed piston engines have two crankshafts, one for the upper piston and other for the lower one. Both the crankshafts are arranged as trunk piston engines and through a series of connected gears. However, the earliest opposed piston engines used to have just one crankshaft in their design. Such arrangement would have three cranks, one at the center which is attached to the lower piston with connecting rod and cross-head. The other two cranks are arranged on the same line as that of the center crank and are connected with the top piston with connecting rods, tie rods and crossheads. The exhaust and scavenge ports at the top and bottom of the cylinder, operates because of the reciprocating motion of the piston. Other equipments such as supercharger, air box etc are attached similar to any conventional diesel engine.

opposed 2 

Working

The air fuel mixture is pushed into the space in between the pistons. The ignition of the mixture pushes both the pistons downwards, leading to power stroke. The ignition is usually provided using a spark plug. As both the pistons move downwards, one of the pistons opens the outlet valve, which pushes the gas out of the exhaust, whereas the other piston opens the inlet valve, pushing in the fresh gas mixture. The compression stroke then takes place and the cycle repeats itself.

opoc-2-stroke-engine1 

Advantage - Better Power to Weight Ratio

The main advantage of opposed piston engine is that unlike conventional engines, where the stresses generated due to firing loads are transferred from the cylinders to the bedplates of the engine, no stresses are transferred and thus it have an excellent power to weight ratio. Moreover, the arrangement of opposed piston engines provides a higher degree of balance than the conventional engine.

Image Credits

http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/12/21/ecomotors-opoc-two-stroke-engines-opposed-piston-opposed-cylinder/

http://media.photobucket.com/image/opposed%20piston%20engine/snake284/ENGINE-710-16-SHOW-500PIX.jpg

http://bioage.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/opoc2_2.png


Comments

Showing all 5 comments
 
Victor Steerup Mar 11, 2011 10:51 PM
opposed piston engine
how about simplifying the crank assembly by using the "scotch yoke"
like the famous Bourke engine? This also takes the side loading off the piston skirts. I just hope this is not the Bourke engine of the 21st century (never produced).
tom blokhus May 28, 2010 8:35 AM
opposed diesel engines
the complexity and cost of having 2 forged crankshaft with connecting gears and a crankdriven supercharger could be overcome by future fuel costs, as this is closely linked to oilwells worldwide not getting filled by itself during the years , then rising fuelprices results.
opposed pistonengines far superior fuel consumption in its class compare a truckengineto a truck engine, a car engine to a car engine same displacement, or it will be as comparing apples and bananas.
no problem making opposed piston engine with prechamber, in side of cylinder,with injector, in fact it would relieve the exhaustport piston from heat.
the napier deltic has the best ratio between number of cylinders and and costly 3plane forged crankshafts. todays most effective conventional diesel truckengineis scania turbocompound at 170grms/h.
best known opposed piston fuelconsumption are the diesel novikov 1,7 litre at 125grms/h
of course superior ship engines consumption, due to its size and better surface to volume area,
but who wants a 25ton engine inside their passenger car or truck or plane?
Lloyd Weaver May 27, 2010 9:54 AM
opposed piston engines
In conventional diesels, fuel rate is close to 150, and ocean diesels equal or exceed 150. The engine efficiency is not the issue with modern transportation, even with airliners. It's in the architecture where huge gains are possible. Assuming we convert to diesels in cars, engine efficiency gains thereafter become small potatoes in comparison to changing the architecture. I’m all for diesels replacing gas engines, but only if HCCI, and that’s harder to do with opposed piston designs. Also, engine weight is not the issue in surface transportation, cost is. We need cheap HCCI engines in cars. Opposed pistons will not be cheap engines, so they will not make it into cars and trucks. Diesels in airplanes, maybe, if HCCI combustion.
lisa Feb 6, 2010 9:29 PM
deltec op engine
napier deltec engine used three crank shafts at apex of delta. op type engine. 18 cylinders, 32 pistons, many gears. usa used some in small craft, eg PT boats at time of vietnam war. napier deltec is 2 stroke diesel.
tom blokhus Jan 18, 2010 12:36 PM
opposed piston advances.
another big advance of opposed piston engines are their unparaleled low fuel consumption, low as 150grams per horspower/hour, no one ewen comes close today, this was made in 1930 by junkers in germany.
tom
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend