Historically, architects have understood the movement concept as the course of an eye that moves in space, yet the architecture itself, in its design and implementation was seen as static, fixed, ideal, and material. Static and equilibrium always have been tenets of traditional architecture, always associated with the concepts of proportionality and stability.
Issues that suggest movement and dynamics in architecture are often driven with picturesque views, where buildings were not only built as static forms, but conceptualized and designed based on models of rigidity and balance.
Even today, the common animation software for the architecture field reinforces that thought, which says that the architectural design belongs to the Cartesian space waiting to be animated by a mobile vision.