Picture this situation:
A beginning teacher is sitting down with a mother and her 17 year old multiply disabled son to begin the process of planning his educational goals for the next six months. Unfortunately, a conflict situation develops when the mother complains loudly and aggressively about the teacher's failure to prioritize areas that she feels are important for her son's future development and learning. The mother believes the son is functioning at a level which greatly exceeds the level estimated by his teacher and supported by his most recent IQ scores and psychology reports. The mother wants to prioritize his learning of current texts, and to focus on the great works of literature. She also wants to see a community education program put in place which encourages him to visit clubs, bars and social venues in order to learn social skills in preparation for his adult years. The mother frequently goes out at night with her son, and enjoys spending time socially with him, despite his inability to communicate verbally, or to give a reliable yes/no response to basic questions.
The teacher, feeling her authority and experience being challenged heavily by the mother. reacts by firmly explaining that the son is not functioning at anything like the level the mother thinks, and it would be completely inappropriate to embark on such meaningless educational activities. The teacher adds that she has seen no evidence that the son would understand any sort of literature, great or otherwise.
The mother becomes distressed, as does the son. She leaves without completing the meeting.