English Catenative Verbs: Linking Verbs to Other Verbs

Written by:  • Edited by: Rebecca Scudder
Updated Aug 30, 2011
• Related Guides: Present Perfect | English Grammar | Present Tense

Catenative verbs form strings of verbs by linking a catenative verb to an infinitive, present participle, or base form of another verb. The following article explains the conjugations and uses of catenatives as well as the difference between catenative verbs and modal or quasi-modal verbs.

Catenative Verbs

Catenative verbs are verbs followed directly by another verb in the infinitive, present participle, or base form. The adjective catenative from the verb catenate means "to connect, to link, to string together" and refers to the connecting of one verb to another. For example, the following English verbs are catenative verbs:

  • The angels begin to sing.
  • This book helped shed light on the problem.
  • We had hoped to start the project early next week.
  • She likes reading books.
  • The children will need to bathe.

Catenative Verbs versus Modal and Quasi-modal Verbs

Catenative verbs resemble modal and quasi-modal verbs in both form (what the verb looks like) and function (what the verb does). Like modals and quasi-modals, catenatives precede another verb. For example:

  • He might bake some bread. (modal)
  • She would rather see a different movie. (quasi-modal)
  • You ought to comb your hair. (quasi-modal)
  • Her husband wants to adopt another puppy. (catenative)

However, unlike modals and quasi-modals, catenative verbs function as the head of the verb phrase. The verb that follows a catenative functions as either a verb phrase complement or a direct object. Modal and quasi-modal verbs, however, function as modals within verb phrases. For example:

  • Verb Phrase Head | Verb Phrase Complement
  • decide | to dye her hair
  • have | to finish his essay

  • Verb Phrase Head | Direct Object
  • like | reading books
  • prefer | to eat fruits and vegetables

  • Modal | Verb Phrase Head
  • should | exercise
  • used to | repair freezers

Catenative verbs further differ from quasi-modal verbs in that the preposition to functions as a particle in quasi-modals but as an infinitive marker following catenative verbs. For example:

  • Modal | Particle | Verb Phrase Head
  • ought | to | jog
  • used | to | teach

  • Catenative | Infinitive Marker | Verb
  • hesitate | to | jump
  • intend | to | sing

Some catenative verbs also resemble modal and quasi-modal verbs in meaning. For example, both the catenative have (to) and the modal must express obligation as in I have to finish my homework first and I must finish my homework first.

Conjugations of Catenative Verbs

Catenative verbs, unlike modal and quasi-modal verbs, have at least four but up to six conjugations depending on the regularity or irregularity of the verb. For example:

  • Base – Infinitive – Present Tense – Past Tense – Present Participle – Past Participle
  • agree – to agree – agree, agrees – agreed – agreeing – agreed
  • decide – to decide – decide, decides – decided – deciding – decided
  • have – to have – have, has – had – having – had
  • plan – to plan – plan, plans – planned – planning – planned
  • want – to want – want, wants – wanted – wanting – wanted

Catenatives, also unlike modals and quasi-modals, express both verb tenses and all four verb aspects. For example:

  • Simple present: She strives to succeed.
  • Simple past: They neglected to water the plants.
  • Present progressive: The child is pretending to paint.
  • Past progressive: The bridesmaids were refusing to dance.
  • Present perfect: I have forgotten to bring the cake.
  • Past perfect: He had intended to send a card.
  • Present perfect-progressive: We have been enjoying reading this book.
  • Past perfect-progressive: He had been proposing traveling to Malaysia.

Some catenative verbs also appear in passive constructions. For example:

  • She was permitted to stay out past midnight.
  • The children are forbidden to eat sweets.
  • My supervisor had been asked to come up with a report.

For a printable list of the most frequent catenative verbs in English, please download English Catenative Verbs Reference List. The list also includes information about the form of the verb following the catenative verb.

References

  • Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Comments

Showing all 5 comments
 
Tom Carlson Feb 16, 2011 11:25 AM
periphrastic modals - relative order?
Hello Heather,
Very impressive stuff here! I have 2 questions from one of our teachers (business English in Stuttgart, Germany) about periphrastic modals, like "have to", "ought to", "be able to", "be supposed to" and the like.
a) are there any regular restrictions for their co-occurrence? If so, are these explainable semantically or rather syntactically? e.g. I can imagine even sentences like "He ought to have to" as a retort, i.e. two periphrastic modals expressing obligation. If we can even double them up, there would seem to be no limits here. But I've been wrong before...
b) is there a relative order that has been discovered for their catenation? why? E.g. "he has to be able to do it" sounds a lot better than "he is able to have to do it." Is it generally true that ability must be expressed after obligation when they co-occur, or what is happening here?
Natalja Jun 11, 2010 3:09 AM
X is said to do Y
what is the function of "is said to" here?
Danilo Mar 21, 2010 5:06 AM
response
Hello Heather Marie,

Thank you very much for the help.It's clearer now but I'll still need to read more on this,it's still murky to me:)
I wonder if it would be a problem for you if I asked for more help here on this,after reading more on the subject?

Best regards
Heather Marie Kosur Mar 20, 2010 9:23 PM
Catenative versus Object
Hi, Danilo, I think this is an area of English grammar were there is still some disagreement. For example, I would probably analyze the first sentence as This (subject) made (predicate) working with them (direct object) an unpleasant experience (object complement) and the second sentence as Max (subject) regrets (predicate) locking the door (direct object).

In my opinion, there are two flavors of catenative verbs. A true catenative verb is one that can take ONLY a verb phrase complement in the form of another verb. For example, "have" meaning "be obligated" can only take a verb as in "I have to clean my room." In the case of "made" and "regret," both verbs can take other forms such as nouns as direct object, e.g., This made a big mess and Max regrets his actions.

So, if the catenative verb can also take other types of direct objects (nouns), then the verb that follows it is a direct object. If the catenative verb can take only a verb, then the verb that follows is a verb phrase complement.

But, like I said, I have found that there is still a lot of discussion about this area of English grammar. Hope this helps, and keep reading!
Danilo Mar 20, 2010 5:40 AM
catenative vs object complement
Hello,

I'm an ESL student struggling with the subject of verb complementation at the moment.I find your articles really instructive and to the point and I'd like to thank you for contributing your articles here and helping people get to grips with complicated grammar topics.
I'd like to ask about the difference between catenative and object complements,specially the cases where the verb in the matrix clause takes -ing form as a complement.
I've found the following sentences in Huddleston&Pullum's "A Student's Introduction to English Grammar" in the part dedicated to catenative constructions:

1. This made working with them an unpleasant experience.

2.Max regrets locking the door.

The authors designate non-finite clause "working with them" in the first clause as an object complement while "locking the door" in the second sentence is analyzed as a catenative complement of the verb "regret".
It would be nice if you would point out a distinction between the two constructions.

Thanks

Danilo
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend