One way to address the complaints of DOL critics is to use the students' own writing as a springboard for these mini-lessons - instead of utilizing pre-packaged curriculum offered commercially. By addressing common and real mistakes made by the students in your class, you can easily develop your own "scope and sequence" for the year. One benefit is that the goals and objectives of this specifically designed scope and sequence are flexible. It can be paired with other diagnostic tools to address real problems that your students are facing now in their personal writing. Furthermore, this curriculum guide can easily be changed as questions naturally arise and new skills are acquired.
By using the students' own writing for your Daily Oral Language lessons, you are also differentiating your instruction. Students who commonly commit the same errors are learning from their peers in a natural environment. At the same time, students who have already mastered the concept(s) being addressed have the opportunity to improve their proofreading skills. This instruction can be delivered in either a large group, small group, or one-on-one setting - again allowing for flexibility and differentiated instruction.
A balanced approach, however, should do more than just identify errors in writing mechanics or sentence structure. It should also model exemplary uses. While this can be accomplished by the traditional method of "re-writing" the sentence in its correct form, a more relevant experience would be to analyze sentences from literary selections the students are studying or from their own peer writing.