It strikes me as ironic that people object to a company outsourcing overseas when that company derives a considerable amount of its profits from overseas sales (and people do indeed object - according to a recent survey, more than 60% of Americans would like to see corporations such as Dell hit with additional tax bill or some other form of sanction). If a company isn't permitted to outsource to other countries, then why should those countries permit the sale of that company's products?
A country which attempted to block international free trade would be committing economic suicide. Should sanctions be imposed on a company which outsources, that company will simply cease to be internationally competitive (and may even be forced to relocate to a less dictatorial jurisdiction).
Matt stated, "If a lot of people have morality issues, I'd say they should look into where they purchase technology and see where it was manufactured. Places, such as TigerDirect, do not outsource." Hmmm. I don't know whether or not TigerDirect outsource, but most of their stock is manufactured by overseas companies! People don't really care where a product is made; the majority of purchasing decisions are made on the basis of quality and price - which is why there are more Toyotas than Fords on US roads!
Furthemore, offshoring isn't only about cutting costs. Companies outsource abroad for the same reason that they recruit from abroad: to obtain access to qualified personnel (and, I must say, that based on my experinces with Dell, this is something of which they are sorely in need!).
The fact is that increased global outsourcing is an absolute inevitability. Countries and companies that embrace it will benefit; those that resist it will suffer.