Using the Dvorak Layout with a Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard

Written by:  • Edited by: Rebecca Scudder
Updated May 6, 2009
• Related Guides: Microsoft

Which keyboard is best for quick, reliable typing and avoiding wrist pain? Is it a Microsoft ergonomic keyboard, a Dvorak layout, or both combined? Here we look at the Dvorak design and the progress of Microsoft's ergonomic keyboards.

In July 1944, the U.S. Navy decided to address a problem that bedeviled them: they had a lot of lousy typists. August Dvorak, PhD, was a Commander in the Navy at that time. He had patented a simplified keyboard layout in 1932 that was designed to decrease same-hand typing, finger velocity and travel, and operator fatigue. The Navy decided to put Dr. Dvorak's theory to test. They selected fourteen lousy typists (average speed 32 words per minute) to retrain to see if they would be faster and more accurate using Dvorak's layout. It took 52 hours of retraining for the typists to regain their original speed. 31 hours later, they were typing at 56 words per minute, which was a 75 percent increase. Dr. Dvorak's theory was that a properly designed keyboard would

  • Balance the load between the left and right hands
  • Maximize the usage of the home row and home position
  • Maximize the frequency of alternating hand responses
  • Minimize the frequency of same-finger typing

In 1996, I read about the Dvorak keyboard layout and decided to try switching over. At that time, I was using an old, noisy keyboard that came with an IBM PC that I purchased in the early 90s. Figure 1 below shows what a Dvorak layout looks like on a standard keyboard.

Dvorak Layout

The Dvorak Keyboard

My Experiences with the Dvorak Layout

I found a freeware typing tutor and dedicated a couple of hours per day to switching over. This was the first real effort I'd put into improving my typing speed and accuracy since high school, and it worked. At the end of the month, I was typing 85 words per minute without errors.

Typing using the Dvorak layout is like alternate strumming - sequences in English text move from hand to hand and form patterns or waves that one can feel and see.

Is it really better? Let's try an experiment. Let's look at this well-known text:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

This sentence from the United States Declaration of Independence contains 178 characters (excluding spaces) which can be typed. Let's compare using a Dvorak layout and a QWERTY layout. We'll look at frequency of handedness, frequency of row used, and which characters required a displacement of the first, fourth, seventh, and tenth fingers from the home row.

56% of all keystrokes were typed by the right hand using the Dvorak layout. 71% of the keystrokes were in the home row, 23% were in the top row, and 6% were in the bottom row. 17% of keystrokes required displacement from the home row.

Using the QWERTY layout, 38% of the characters were typed by the right hand. 32% of keystrokes were in the home row, 52% were in the top row, and 14% were in the bottom row. 27% of the characters required displacement from the home row.

Wrist and Finger Pain

In 1999, I bought a touring bicycle and rode it 5,000 miles that year. This was pretty tough on my wrists (due to my poor technique), and it became painful to use my keyboard. Seeking some relief, I looked at the Microsoft Ergonomic split keyboards.

I eventually bought a "Natural Multimedia" keyboard. It came with a CD that installed the "Intellitype" driver that allowed the PC to use the special buttons on the keyboard. This keyboard was heavy, bulky, and a joy to type on. I bought two of them. On each, the front-mounted folding legs promptly broke off. They were also very noisy.

Microsoft Natural Multimedia Keyboard

Natural Multimedia Keyboard circa 1999

Microsoft Natural Elite Ergonomic Keyboard

My next keyboard was the "Natural Elite," which is still being sold as this is written. This keyboard is smaller than the Mulitimedia or its predecessor, the "Natural Pro". It's lightweight and tends to skid around if used on a very smooth surface. It also has an odd arrangement of the arrow buttons with the up and down keys bracketing the left and right keys rather than the inverted t-shape.

Natural Elite Keyboard

Microsoft Natural Elite Keyboard

Next: Needless Design Changes, the Natural Ergonomic 4000 Features, and Summary

Showing page 1 of 2

Comments

Showing all 4 comments
 
Lamar Stonecypher Feb 11, 2010 10:43 AM
RE: Using the Dvorak Layout with a Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard
Hi, Greg,

When I started using the Dvorak layout, the Microsoft Ergonomic 4000 keyboard did not exist. I checked Google Images to see if I could find one without luck. However, you can use Google Images and search for "Dvorak layout" and find several templates that you can print to refer to.

Good luck!
Greg Feb 10, 2010 12:05 PM
Image of 4000 Layout
I haven't been able to find an image of the Microsoft Ergo Keyboard 4000 with Dvorak that I could use for learning the layout. Can you send me yours?
Lamar Stonecypher Sep 2, 2009 8:25 AM
Key removal
Hi, Jay,

Since the keyboard is contoured, the keys are all not the same. This makes them less interchangeable than some other keyboards. I didn't use the stickers when I switched. Instead, I taped an image of the layout to my PC and referred to it when I got stuck.
GLEN Sep 1, 2009 10:07 PM
KEY REMOVAL
Can the keys be physically removed on the Microsoft Ergo Keyboard 4000 to make the Dvorak? Or do you need to buy those stickers?
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend