Internet Security Suite Comparison: Kaspersky vs. Norton – Part 3

Written by:  • Edited by: Bill Bunter
Updated Aug 27, 2010
• Related Guides: Malware

This is last part of this series of article comparing Norton Internet Security 2010 and Kaspersky Internet Security 2010. In this section, we will compare the anti-spam, web and malware protection and detection by both programs.

Anti-Spam – Winner: NIS 2010

KIS 2010 will suggest running anti-spam training on existing e-mails. If the customer will not run the anti-spam training, the protection status will continue to display as reminder (can be hidden if you prefer to not to run the anti-spam training). I let KIS 2010 to run this training option and proceeded to test its anti-spam detection.

Using 10 new spam samples , NIS 2010 perform better than KIS 2010’s anti-spam. 10 out of 10 spam were caught by Norton while KIS 2010 detected 9 only .

Web Protection – Winner: NIS 2010

I visited 15 websites that will either download a malicious file or known as spyware or rogue website. This is to check if NIS 2010 and KIS 2010 will block or alert on the download or loading of the page.

NIS 2010 prevented or alerted and prevented 13 out of 15 malicious or unwanted website or download while KIS 2010 only prevented 6 web links or malicious downloads. However, NIS 2010 allowed the download of 2 malicious files without detecting it as malware even though their origins (website) were flagged by its Norton Download Insight as risk. The firewall of Norton is fast enough though to alert on the connection attempt being made by the downloaded risks. This should make the customer decide easily to manually delete or quarantine the offending files, run a full system.

Malware Protection, Detection and Removal – Winner: KIS 2010 (On-Access Protection) / KIS 2010 (On-Demand Detection) / Both (Removal of Detected Risks)

Using 182 malware samples, I put test the on-access and on-demand detection by Kaspersky and Norton.

Real-Time (On-Access) Protection: KIS 2010’s on-access protection has prevented the transfer of 170 malware out of 182. 12 malware samples were transferred successfully on the system drive. NIS 2010 has detected in real-time a total of 117 out of 182 malware and allowed the transfer of 65 malware samples.

On-Demand Detection/Manual Virus Scanner: The remaining samples that NIS 2010 has allowed to be saved in the system drive are scanned using its on-demand scanner. Result: NIS 2010 able to detect and removed 54 malware out of 65. Leaving the system unprotected against 11 items. KIS 2010’s on-demand scanner have little task to do – to try to detect the 12 samples. It able to detect 2 only and leave the system unprotected against 9 items.

Both programs have removed what they can detect without issue.

Images

12 undetected by KAV's on-access protection9 undetected by KAV's On-Demand Scanner65 undetected by NAV on-access protection11 undetected by NAV's on-demand scannerWeb Protection by NIS 2010Web Protection by NIS allowed download of 2 risksKIS URL Advisor allow viewing of Spyware app siteMemory Usage of KIS during a scanMemory Usage of NIS during a scanAdd-ons for IE by NIS 2010Add-ons for IE by KIS 2010Handy Command in using KIS 2010Handy Command in using NIS 2010

Trial Edition and Price – Winner: NIS 2010 / KIS 2010 (Trial Edition)

Norton Internet Security costs $59.99 for 3 Home PCs or 2 years of subscription for single PC. Kaspersky Internet Security costs $59.95 for single PC with 1 year subscription.

Both programs is offering a fully functional trial edition but NIS 2010 will only allow 15 days to try compare to 30 days trial in using KIS 2010.

Conclusion

The overall winner is Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 – from its installer, UI, features and protection against new and positive malware. The price and web protection of Norton is attractive though!


Comments

Showing all 12 comments
 
Adam Dec 15, 2010 6:46 AM
I see no difference
Come on, I can see no difference between those two programs in terms of features and level of protection they deliver. This chart clearly shows those programs are nearly identical and I think that it's really a matter of personal taste whether they choose one or another as their protection suite.
Jinesh Oct 13, 2010 7:02 AM
Kaspersky vs. Norton
Ha ha.. Lot of cant accept tht KIS is far superior to Norton as well to others, because its Russian!!. In security Products, European Products are superior and practical than US products(except AVG). Norton and McAfee, both r notorious for resource hogging and poor performance.
Tony Oct 10, 2010 7:52 PM
RE: Internet Security Suite Comparison: Kaspersky vs. Norton – Part 3
Kis Better than NiS, Eset SS Blows the Doors off of Both!!! No False Positives, No BS Features Small Footprint, Killer Scan
abhishel Oct 1, 2010 8:45 AM
kaspersky vs norton
dudes!!!!!!nis id d best!!!!!
FactPatriot Sep 12, 2010 11:58 AM
Kaspersky 2011 vs. Norton 2011
Norton has publicly stated and admitted that they allow particular spywares to infiltrate and install on the user's machine; thus, I do not use Symantec Norton for that reason.
Kaspersky publicly states that they will not to that; thus, I use it.
As of September 2010, they are both very good; however, for the specific reason stated above, I went with Kaspersky.
FREEDOM, fight for it, use it, or lose it.
DD The Hacker Aug 29, 2010 12:01 AM
Nis Vs KSI
Identity protection:
Inspects websites to make sure they're not fakes
Automatically detects, stores, and secures passwords and personal information
guards against online identity theft
Identifies unsafe websites and suspicious sellers so you can surf and shop with confidence

NetWorking:
Helps Secure and monitor your home network
Automatically secures your PC when connection to public wireless hotspots

Backup:
Protects valuable files from computer disaster
restores damaged or deleted files and folders
includes 2GB of secure online storage service

PC Tune UP:
Automatically finds and fixes problems that slow your computer
Helps Optimize PC performance by removing unwanted disk clutter and registry files
Analyzes your system and provides tips on how to keep your PC running smoothly

Support:
Provides free chat or phone support
AutoFix technology will diagnose and fix common problems for you

hmmm why the hell was none of this mentioned against KasperSky? because KasperSky pays websites like these to do these fake surveys.

don't be fking fooled by rip off companies.
Dd The Hacker Aug 28, 2010 11:54 PM
Nis Vs KSI
i have Norton 360 4.0 edition, which covers more then kaspersky does.

people always try to say they compare Malware tests, however this is quoted from one of the developers, "On none of our packages does it say Malware Protection, if you get protected by malware using my software consider it a friendly gift"

and this is true, i've looked at the past 3 year packages of all their products, not one says malware protection, 93% of all surveys are made up, and are done by the company comparing to norton's to try to sway new people.

the fact is, Norton 360 and Malwarebytes pro. is all you'll ever need to protect your computers, these two programs HAVE NEVER! and will never clash against other programs, like other anti virus' do, that say they are better then nortons, i've personally seen KasperSky and Avira clash against many many anti hacking programs, such as Gameguard and Xtrap.

i am also sick and tired of the same arguement "it takes more resources" well if you have a piece of crap computer, of course ull notice a sluggish attitude, infact youll notice it on any Real-time program, the fact is, Norton's high end AV's are just that, High End, and not meant for pieces of crap.

these are the things nortons DOES offer and DOES protect against, ontop of that, if there is a problem their anti virus doesnt pick up, THEY THEMSELVES FIX IT!

Core Security:
protects against viruses, spyware, trojan horses, worms, bots, and rootkits.
Stops threats at point of entry with a quiet two-way firewall *YES, two-way! not single*
Provides CONTINUOUS AUTOMATIC PROTECTIONS AGAINST NEW THREATS! *this is TRUE Real time!*
Reduces scan time with smart scanning

Advanced Security:
Protects against web based attacks that use vulnerabilities in your browser
prevents others from taking control of your pc

Those are only 2 of the sections and ill post rest below
Pankaj Dey Jun 27, 2010 3:40 PM
Best is NIS
Im with NIS last more then 3 years and in the meantime I've use KIS and other anti-virus software but still Norton product is best in front of me ........ thanks
My new NIS didn't Work! Jun 24, 2010 11:14 AM
Norton Bundling with Communist China!
I living in Taiwan that hostile with the Communist China, my computer often attacked by the Spy from Communist China,
this is my first reason to select anti-spy ware product (Norton IS 2010),

By 60 days trial, it is good , for instance, when I was surfing most of website located the Communist China, NIS 2010 prevented or alerted of these malicious website.

Unfortunately, after I updated my trial version to a formal Traditional Chinese version., Everything was changed ! it lost of protection!

the NIS show me , all of the malicious Chinese website are security!

After I performed a complete scan use Traditional Chinese NIS 2010, only 7 tracking cookies was found and removed!

At the same time, another European Spy wares detector (Trial) show me there 86 Trojans/ Virus embedded in my computer!!!
What is meaning for my Purchase?

Today, I just to know Norton Asia customer service center also located in Communist CHINA ( the Biggest Hacker HomeBase in the world ) when I try to call them!

I guess NIS (Traditional Chinese version) product also made by Communist Chinese, and already
embedded a number of Spy ware by the Communist political police !

However, I must remove their product completely from my computer!!
virusbox Jun 10, 2010 5:26 AM
nis
yes
its nis the best................

kis has many things to learn frm nis..........

resource using....& .....fihrewall
Richard May 2, 2010 1:17 PM
Kaspersky vs. Norton
Kaspersky wins hands down! I tried Norton and my PC ground to a halt. Kaspersky does the same job but no where near as intrusive. If Kaspersky was a big brother watching over you, Norton would be an interfering parent not learning that from what you do you may be able to look after yourself a little bit.
Michael Collier Apr 23, 2010 9:57 AM
I Will Never Buy Kaspersky Again!
When I loaded Kaspersky Internet Security, I was amazed that it took 24 hours or more to run a full
scan! Also the computer raced off and on during
the scan. This never happens with Norton. I was unable to get competent assistance from Kaspersky in correcting the problem. I had a much easier time installing Norton Internet Security than Kaspersky. I find Norton's visuals much crisper, more to the point than Kaspersky's 'directories' of things to do.
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend