Which is Better? CounterSpy vs. Malwarebytes Anti-Malware - Part 2

Written by:  • Edited by: Bill Bunter
Updated Aug 20, 2010
• Related Guides: Malware | Windows

This is the final part of comparing MBAM and CounterSpy. In this section, we will discuss the scan, memory and malware detection performance by Sunbelt Software and Malwarebytes.org

Memory usage and Scan Performance: Winner – Malwarebytes (Scan Performance)/CounterSpy (Memory Usage)

CounterSpy will use up to 3MB of memory while Malwarebytes will use only 1.1MB. During a scan, MBAM will take 50MB of memory while CS will only use 3.5MB.

A quick scan using MBAM on 120GB Hard-drive has finished scanning 92,237 objects in 4 minutes and 54 seconds with detection on my disabled Windows Automatic Updates (because I prefer to manually check for Windows Update!). CounterSpy’s quick scan is done in 4 minutes in 49 seconds by scanning 37,714 objects only.

Malware Protection and Detection: Winner - CounterSpy

Real-Time Protection: Using 50 positive and unique malware samples, the real-time protection by CounterSpy perform better than Malwarebytes. CounterSpy’s Active Protection has caught 18 out of 50 samples while MBAM’s real-time protection only caught 1 out of 50 but not during the transfer. MBAM's real-time protection only work when I opened the folder containing the 50 samples.

On-Demand Detection: When MBAM’s real-time protection failed to catch in real-time the remaining 49 malware samples, I run its on-demand scanner to test how many it can detect: MBAM is able to detect 23 samples during the on-demand scan. Using the same method, CounterSpy’s on-demand scanner detected another 24 items.

Total Detections: Out of 50 malware samples, CounterSpy is able to protect and detect against 42 malware leaving 8 undetected. Malwarebytes only detected and protect against 23, leaving the system with 27 undetected malware samples.

Below is the screenshot of their scanner and the list of samples. Note that the samples was gathered this month only (from malware spam and live malware links). "X" - means detected. These 50 malware samples were used also to compare the detections ability of Ad-Aware Free and SUPERAntiSpyware Free.

Images

Total Detections by MBAM & CounterSpyTotal Detections by MBAM & CounterSpyReal-Time Protection by CounterSpyReal-time Protection by MBAMOn-demand Scanner of MBAMOn-demand Scanner of CounterSpy

Price: Winner – Malwarebytes

Malwarebytes only cost $24.95 with lifetime license (free updates and upgrades for life on a single PC!) while CounterSpy is offering $19.95 – 1 PC with a year of subscription.

Trial edition: MBAM do not offer trial edition of its real-time protection but you can use the free edition to scan and remove malware. CounterSpy offers 15-days trial of its real-time protection. When the trial ends, the program will still work to scan for malware only but no removal.

Conclusion

CounterSpy is the clear winner when it comes to protection and detection. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware's scan engine need to add improvement in detecting malware that has been archived by malware distributors and to detect the samples during transfer or download instead of only monitoring the system for already installed malware. Prevention is better than cure!


Comments

Showing all 2 comments
 
Donna Buenaventura Dec 22, 2009 7:50 PM
RE: Which is Better? CounterSpy vs. Malwarebytes Anti-Malware - Part 2
Hi Raphael,
I have not seen report of incompatibility of CS with KIS 2010 but if ever you'll find issue, it is recommended to add CS executables in KIS as trusted applications then you should add the directory of CS in KIS to exempt CS files and memory process. This is the same recommendation that MBAM team is recommending to its customers if any other real-time scanner will have issue with their application.
As to CS and TF... it's not a problem. TF complements antivirus and antispyware programs.

Regards,
Donna
Raphael Dec 22, 2009 10:45 AM
Compatibility question
I'm currently using Kaspersky Internet Security(KIS) 2010, along with ThreatFire and MBAM paid version with no conflict among those 3 security program, I heard KIS 2010 has many compatibility issue, if I replace my MBAM paid with CounterSpy would it conflict with the rest of my security software (KIS & ThreatFire)?
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend