Different Types of DVI Cables and Connectors

Written by:  • Edited by: Michele McDonough
Updated Apr 17, 2010

Still using a VGA connector? Before we explain if, when, and how to upgrade to DVI, we need to understand which of the subtly-different types of Digital Video Interface cables and connectors are available, and which you should use.

Our previous article explained why, in theory and practice, DVI is better than a VGA (more correctly D-sub) connection. We also revealed that the difference isn’t usually worth an immediate upgrade, but the move to DVI should be worked into other purchase plans. The problem is, there are quite a few different flavours of DVI, and an LCD flat screen is not necessarily a fully digital screen. What is DVI D input, what is the difference between a Single and Dual link cable, and further questions about DVI cables and connecotrs, are answered below.

Different Types of DVI Cable

DVI-D vs DVI-I
click to enlarge
The good news is that the transition to digital is easier to make because different DVI connectors are backwards compatible with analog signals and cheap adaptors mean compatibility with VGA ports. The bad news is you need to know which DVD cables do what.

There are 2 factors that differentiate DVI cables: the types of signal carried, and the presence or absence of Dual-Link capability. Cables can be DVI-A, DVI-D, or DVI-I, meaning they carry signals which are, respectively: Analog only; Digital only; or, in the case of Integrated, both. DVI-D and DVI-I cables can also be Dual-Link. This allows them to carry more data, used by screens with performance higher than a 1920 x 1080 resolution at 60Hz refresh rate and 24 bit colour depth.

DVI-A
click to enlarge
The picture at right shows a DVI-I, Dual Link, female connector. It has holes instead of pins; the pins are on the male connector. The monitor and graphics cards have female ports, and cables have male plugs at both ends. The red squares show the holes for the analog signal, which is how you can tell a DVI-I from a DVI-D. The green square shows the extra 6 holes for the Dual Link signal, which is how you tell a Dual Link from a Single Link DVI connector. The picture on the left shows which holes and pins would be absent from a DVI-A, which are always single link. Note that while the female connectors have a cross shaped hole; the male ones usually have just a horizontal tab.

Some argue that the –D and –A suffix cables do their specific jobs better, and this is probably true at some level. Particularly if you have the kind of equipment that makes the cable costs negligible. But, for someone in the process of upgrading, DVI-I is your friend.

When to Upgrade to DVI

The only case where the difference between DVI and VGA is worth an immediate upgrade is where you already have a digital monitor and your computer (or graphics card) provides a digital signal. If your computer has a DVI connector, it can output a digital signal. It will most likely be a DVI-I connector, since it allows manufacturers to include analog support without having to find space for a VGA port. Your monitor most likely also uses DVI-I, but if it is particularly high-end, it may use DVI-D. Also check to see if they are Dual or Single Link. They are most likely Dual Link.

If you have DVI-I at both ends, you can use a DVI-I cable, which offers greater flexibility (in different applications, not how bendy the cable is) if you decide to use it for something else down the road. You can also use the theoretically superior DVD-D cable. If you have DVI-D at either or both ends, you have to use a DVI-D cable. Cables of both types carrying reputable brand names are available at Newegg for under $10. The cables we have linked to are Dual-Link.

Where possible, go with Dual-Link, whether using a DVI-D or DVI-I cable. Even if your current equipment isn’t using all the bandwidth, your next upgrade might. If either or both of your computer and monitor only have Single Link ports, you will need a Single Link cable. Don’t worry, if your gear could take advantage of Dual Link’s extra pins, it would have them.

If your monitor, despite being an LCD, only has a VGA port (a common practice on lower end products or older products even from reputable manufacturers), it can’t take advantage of DVI, and you should follow the upgrade advice given in the next article.


Comments

Showing all 2 comments
 
J. F. Amprimoz Jul 29, 2009 5:56 PM
120 Hz Bottleneck
Assuming the computer's refresh rate is set up the same at the monitor's, 120, that is quite a poser.

I don't think it would be a bandwidth problem if it is doing it at lower resolutions, but it might be worth trying to turn down the color depth as well.

You could try swapping the cable for another one, but I don't think you need to spend for a super high end one, and good Dual link should be fine.

For a windows based machine, I would ask about how your vertical synch settings are set, but I don't know much about Macs. If there is a way to lock the vertical synch of the GPU and triple buffer frames, I would try with both of these features on (I would try turning them off as well if they were on and that didn't work)

Wish I had a better answer for you Bjorn,

Jean
Björn Lidestam Jul 1, 2009 4:47 AM
Video playback at 120 Hz... cable as bottleneck?
Hi,

I'm trying to conduct a psychophysics experiment on human temporal resolution in speech vs. nonspeech. To do this, I need to have small as many frames per second as possible to manipulate. I do have a new and fast Mac Pro with the best graphics card available, a fast CRT monitor as well as a new Samsung LCD flatscreen, both capable of 120 Hz.

However, when I play test video clips flickering black/white at 120 Hz (with QuickTime Pro), QuickTime tells that actual playback is around 120 fps... but the screen image is either black or white, with occasional flicker. Apparently, the fast presentation rate does not sync with neither monitor. Regardless of spatial resolution of the clip.

Would you think that the DVI cable may be the bottleneck? If so, are there performance differences between DVI cables of the same type (say, DVI-D, dual link)? If so, do you have a recommendation for a really good one?

Finding experts who really know about fast video playback is very hard. I am truly thankful for any help I can get. Thanks!

Sincerely,
Björn Lidestam, post doc research fellow, Linköping University, Sweden
 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Email to a friend